It appears that NumericTermAttributeImpl doesn't support cloning. Is this
simply an oversight, or is there a reason why this isnt possible?
I'm trying to clone a State containing a NumericTermAttribute, and I end up
with all of the BytesRefs being equal to the last instance, since the
Numeric
Thanks for closing this off.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Piotr Idzikowski
wrote:
> We have detected the problem: the excessive(!) amount of memory allocated
> to Java heap. This articles helped us find the issue:
>
> http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
>
>
We have detected the problem: the excessive(!) amount of memory allocated
to Java heap. This articles helped us find the issue:
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html
Although the article suggests the minimum-possible memory approach as a
mere recommendation, too
Yes, Agree,
Updates in hierarchy is very common use-case. And seeing path components in
different hierarchy is not accepted by customers.
In some cases relating based on path components makes sense.
Just out of interest, can it be ever done with Lucene, by some
customization, or some attempts ma
Not automatically. There's no reason to assume that 'India' is the same in
'India/Gujarat' and 'Asia/India'. Furthermore, if you first add a document
with India/Gujarat and later add a document Asia/India, we cannot go back
to the other document and update the hierarchy.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 3:2
Is there some way to achieve this at Lucene level. so i can get facet like
below ?
Doc1: Asia + Asia/India
Doc2: India + Asia/India/Gujarat
Which can result into this:
Asia/India/Gujarat (2)
Can Lucene internally index like above, as 'India' value already exist as
path of some other document ?
Hi,
I was wondering if Lucene supports applying a filter to an MLT search?
I believe that Solr can do it, but I'm not sure if Lucene can ..
A possible use case is "find me the 10 most similar documents to X
created in the last month".
Thanks
- Chris
--
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 12:03 +0100, sreedevi s wrote:
>I am doing a scalability analysis for lucene search in my application.I
> was running my junits with different sets of data which are like
> 1K,10K,100K and 1000K.
[...]
Your table copy-paste did not work. I tried extracting the key data:
Lucene does not understand the word "India", therefore the facets that are
actually indexed are:
Doc1: Asia + Asia/India
Doc2: India + India/Gujarat
When you ask for top children, you will get Asia + India, both with a count
of 1.
Shai
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Jigar Shah wrote:
> Very
Very simple question, on facet
Index has 2 documents as follows:
Doc1
Indexed facet path: Asia/India
Doc2
Indexed facet path: India/Gujarat
Now while faceted search
facets.getTopChildren()
Will it return 1(Asia) result or 2(Asia, India) ?
So basically will it join values and return hierarchy
Hi,
I am doing a scalability analysis for lucene search in my application.I
was running my junits with different sets of data which are like
1K,10K,100K and 1000K. I kept my indexes in memory and then tried accessing
the same test multiple times.ie, I built my index when my test ran first
time a
11 matches
Mail list logo