Re: Chinese sorting

2014-12-18 Thread Tomoko Uchida
Yes, sorting Kanji is not so easy as Hiragana/Kanji. We simply expect that collators sort strings based on phonetics regardless of how they written in (Hiragana, Katakana, Kanji.) However a Kanji has multiple (usually 2 or 3) readings. We human naturally make judgement which reading is suitable de

Re: including self-joins in parent/child queries

2014-12-18 Thread Michael Sokolov
Nice example, Greg; yes I can see how this can all become a little bewildering if you mix documents of different types having the same field. Keeping in mind that types are not really represented in the index, but are really just mental constructs we impose, it's not all that surprising they d

Re: Chinese sorting

2014-12-18 Thread Nils Knappmeier
Hi Tomoko, does sorting with Locala.JAPANESE also work for Kanji. Since Hiragana and Katakana are based on the phonetics, I guess it is easier to define a sorting order. But Kanji is more similar to the Chinese. Thanks, Nils On 17.12.2014 17:01, Tomoko Uchida wrote: Hi, Nils, I don't kno