Philippe Kernévez [pkerne...@octo.com] wrote:
> We use Lucene 2.4 (provided by Alfresco).
Lucene 2.4 is 6 years old. The obvious advice is to upgrade, but I guess you
have your reasons not to.
> We looked at a memory dump with Eclipse Memory Analyser, and we were quite
> surprised to see that mo
Hi,
I'm new on Lucene and on a quite old existing project.
We use Lucene 2.4 (provided by Alfresco).
We have a Lucene Index of about 5,5Go on the disk.
We have heavy memory consumption and allocation, it seems that most of that
memory is consummed by Lucene index.
We looked at a memory dump with
The source of data is Oracle DB and that is not an option for us due to the
volume of requests we are expect and the amount of text we are pulling.
IndexSearcher is managed via Searchmanger.
>>> If you are querying for most of the fields in the index the it might be
more efficient to iterat
