MultiFieldAttribute is deprecated but the replacement is not documented

In 3.6.2, I notice MultiFieldAttribute is deprecated. So I looked to the docs to find the replacement: https://lucene.apache.org/core/3_6_2/api/contrib-queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/standard/config/MultiFieldAttribute.html ...and the Deprecated note doesn't say what we're supposed to

Re: in-memory terms dictionary/Lucene-3069

Just create your own Codec, or override the default one's getPostingsFormatForField, to return FSTPostingFormat. Then set that Codec on the IndexWriterConfig you pass to IndexWriter. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Marcio Napoli wrote: > Thanks

Case-insensitive sorting - Lucene 4

We're trying to convert an application from Lucene 3.6 to the current release. We used to be able to pass the result of the static method below as the FieldComparator in a SortField constructor. This code doesn't compile with the latest release, but in converting it, we've been unable to get the

Re: in-memory terms dictionary/Lucene-3069

Thanks Mike! But, how can i configure IndexWriter (4.6) to use theses codecs? Thanks Marcio 2014/1/22 Michael McCandless > Hi, > > That was committed to trunk only (5.0) so fat, and is available under > the "codecs" module, under org.apache.lucene.codecs.memory.* > > Mike McCandless > > http:

Re: Performance testing Lucene

All the source code for the nightly Lucene perf tests I run ( http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/ ) are here: https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/luceneutil/ These are also the scripts I use for A/B performance tests for a new patch. It's somewhat tricky getting those Pyth

Re: in-memory terms dictionary/Lucene-3069

Hi, That was committed to trunk only (5.0) so fat, and is available under the "codecs" module, under org.apache.lucene.codecs.memory.* Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Marcio Napoli wrote: > Hey! :) > > How could i use this new reader/writer ? >

Re: BytesRef equals() method

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: Hi, > DocsAndPositionsEnum.getPayload() is allowed to re-use the returned > BytesRef under the hood. Ah, I am starting to get it. The BytesRef would be directly stored in the key set of the map, but since its properties can change, the

in-memory terms dictionary/Lucene-3069

Hey! :) How could i use this new reader/writer ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3069 Thanks, Marcio Go beyond Lucene™ features with Numere® http://numere.stela.org.br

Re: BytesRef equals() method

DocsAndPositionsEnum.getPayload() is allowed to re-use the returned BytesRef under the hood. So, if you want to hold a copy of the payload across two or more calls to .getPayload you'll have to make a deep copy of (BytesRef.deepCopyOf) the returned BytesRef yourself. Mike McCandless http://blog.

Re: updating docs when using SortedSetDocValuesFacetFields

Note that Lucene doesn't support general in-place document updates, and updating a document means first deleting it and adding it back. Therefore if you only intend to add/change few categories of an existing document, you have to fully re-index the document. This is not specific to categories but

Re: BytesRef equals() method

On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:14:59 +0100 Yann-Erwan Perio wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Steven Schlansker > wrote: > > Certainly, but my problem still persists if I do not do it. I spent > the whole night debugging the code, to no avail. As a matter of fact, > when I run a series of tests