On 09/19/2013 07:41 PM, gudiseashok wrote:
> I am learning lucene, I am developing an application do do a search in log
> files in multi-environment boxes, I have googled for the deeper
> understanding, but all examples were just referring for just field "File
> Name" & "Modification (i.e. fieldtyp
Hi,
I'm trying to do something very simple with the parent/child
blockjoinquery.
I have a several child docs and a parent doc added to index in the same
order.
There are 3 fields + filter field for the parent doc.
And 2 fields in child doc.
I'm trying to get child document matching a field X :
Hi,
I'm trying to optimize an index we have, and one thing that has come up
recently is that we're not really using term frequencies, and we don't need
any scoring. We noticed that the term frequencies (.doc files) are a
significant chunk of the total index size, and we'd like to reduce those,
or
Hi, Adrien
thanks for the quick replay. Let me try it out.
hao
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This means that there is either a bug in Lucene or that your index is
> corrupted. Can you reproduce this failure if you reindex data? The
> output of CheckIndex would
Ashok,
I would look at solr which has an amount more field types to support more
queries.
E.g. there you have a nice query syntax for times-spans and fantastic caching.
I think there's very few initiatives for indexing logs and I would be
interested to see the results of your entreprise.
paul
Hi
I am learning lucene, I am developing an application do do a search in log
files in multi-environment boxes, I have googled for the deeper
understanding, but all examples were just referring for just field "File
Name" & "Modification (i.e. fieldtypes associated with text search) and they
are
I wanted to know whether the terms are hashed before putting them in the term
dictionary in Lucene. Also, does Earlybird use Hashes to retrieve the
documents which contain the searched term.
The Earlybird Paper [1] does talk about indexing the terms but can you tell
me where exactly is the hashing
Hi Uwe,
thanks for the fast reply. I removed the CSQ and checked again my test,
still there is mainly no difference with searching with
TopFieldCollector.
Just a clarification; the method getQuery(...) in my code is returning a
BooleanQuery, where the user input is expanded on some of the fields
