Thanks Mike, this clarifies my understanding as well.
Regds,
Rizwan
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> I think you just need to add fieldType.setStoreTermVectors(true) as well.
>
> However, I see you are also indexing offsets into the postin
want to use the infix suggester but instead to create different index for
every postid (which was initial consideration - not very wise one :)) I
want to create one index containing all the information about the postsid
and every comment and for every to suggest matches only for a specific
postid.
but if i want to make this a suggester will be a hard case isnt it?
You have to re-index the parent + all children (and delete the
previous parent + all its children) whenever you want to add a new
child doc.
If you want to delete just children then you can do that w/o
reindexing the full block.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Aug 14, 20
and can documents cam be added dynamic i.e new comments can be indexed and
added to parent doc? or have to rebuild the index
2013/8/14 Michael McCandless
> Yes.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:50 AM, vonPuh fonPuhendorf
> wrote:
> > hi,
Have one big index holding everything, with a "folder" indexed field
that you can use for filtering?
--
Ian.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Jason B. Nacional
wrote:
> Hi Lucene Developers:
>
> I just want to ask some help regarding our new implementation of indexing
> process.
>
> We
Hi Lucene Developers:
I just want to ask some help regarding our new implementation of indexing
process.
We use this API for searching a number of documents in a review platform
(e-discovery).
On our search module, we index a document per folder. The problem is that a
user can create his own
Yes.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:50 AM, vonPuh fonPuhendorf
wrote:
> hi, can i use BlockJoinQuery to search only relative content i.e a parrent
> will be post id and the children will be all the comments in the
> threads(userids)
>
> and return res
hi, can i use BlockJoinQuery to search only relative content i.e a parrent
will be post id and the children will be all the comments in the
threads(userids)
and return results only for comments from exact postid? i.e user 222 seach
for "blah" from postid "1234" and results from only that postid wi
If you're using StandardAnalyzer what's the reference to
CustomAnalyzerForCaseSensitive all about? Someone else with more
patience or better diagnostic skill may well spot your problem but I
can't.
My final suggestion is that you build and post the smallest possible
self-contained program, using
Hello. I gave the complete code sample so that anyone can try and let me
know. This is because this issue is really taking a toll on me.
I am so close yet so far.
Yes, I am using analyzer to index the document. The Analyzer is
StandardAnalyzer but I have commented the LowerCaseFilter code from
I was rather hoping for something smaller!
One suggestion from a glance is that you're using some analyzer
somewhere but building a BooleanQuery out of a TermQuery or two. Are
you sure (test it and prove it) that the strings you pass to the
TermQuery are EXACTLY what has been indexed?
--
Ian.
Hello. The problem is as follows:
I have a document containing information in lines. So I am indexing all
files line by line.
So If I say in my document I have,
INSIDE POST OF SERVER\
and in my index file created I have,
INSIDE POST OF SERVER\
and I fire a boolean qu
I think you just need to add fieldType.setStoreTermVectors(true) as well.
However, I see you are also indexing offsets into the postings, which
is wasteful because now you've indexed offsets twice in your index.
Usually only one place is needed, i.e. if you will use
PostingsHighlighter, only inde
OK I see why your test in 3.5 was passing: if you just run
SpanTermQuery alone, the hit count will be correct, because it never
needs to access positions (I suspect?).
Ie, a SpanTermQuery alone is like running TermQuery.
It's when SpanTermQuery is used inside other SpanQuerys that positions
will
Well, you have supplied a bit more info - good - but I still can't
spot the problem. Unless someone else can I suggest you post a very
small self-contained program that demonstrates the problem.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Ankit Murarka
wrote:
> Hello.
> The problem does
Hi Michael,
It is also a size constraint! The FSA would be horrible huge.
FYI: the different fuzzy distances are not implemented by a simple "parameter"
to some algorithm. For every fuzzy distance there is a separate(automatically
generated) Java class with huge FSA matrices that handles the fuz
The limit of 2 is hard-coded precisely because good performance for editing
distances above 2 cannot be guaranteed.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tobias
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:00 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Fuzzy Searching on Lucene / S
Hello.
The problem does not seem to be getting solved.
As mentioned, I am indexing each line of each file.
The sample text present inside LUKE is
\
\
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>Size of list array::0\
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
org.com.dummy,INFO,<<
As Mike said, this is an intended change. The test
passed in 3.5 because there was no check if
Span queries were working on a field that supported
them. In 4.x this is checked and an error is thrown.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Yonghui Zhao wrote:
> In our old code, we create t
Ankit, Term Vector is the informational guide to get the details about your
indexed information. TermOffset : is providing you the details about where
the term occurs in the given data value. e.g. "lucene is smart" Here terms
are : lucene, is, smart, TermVectorOffset would be position of the terms
21 matches
Mail list logo
