the reason why you can't omit it today is that $num_position ==
$term_frequency ie. we need to store it anyways. Yet, I kind of agree
that this is an impl detail so we could in theory return 1 as the TF
from the DocsAndPosEnum but this would break our APIs as well since
DocsAndPositionsEnum require
As the subject says, is it possible to omit the term frequencies for a
field, but still keep positions? Term frequencies are omitted for better
scoring under our model, but positions are required for span queries. Are
the two concepts related? Are they indexed in the same data structure?
One optio
Why not use one of the suggesters under lucene/suggest/*?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Ankit Murarka
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 1. What I am trying to implement is "Complete Suggestion Match-Did You Mean
> feature for a phrase. I did it for Single Wor
Try:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_4_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
-Original Message-
From: raghavendra.k@barclays.com [mailto:raghavendra.k@barclays.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 3:17 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apach
Hello.
1. What I am trying to implement is "Complete Suggestion Match-Did You
Mean feature for a phrase. I did it for Single Word. I want to do it now
for Sentence."
2. What my understanding of indexing each line as a valid phrase in a
particular file is as follows:
a. Instead of providing
