Hi,
I'm not quite sure on what you mean when you are saying that the
suggestions are coming from a dictionary instead of the index.
In your example, which looks okay, the suggestion will come from the the
reader which is reading from your index.
One thing I noticed, when you are creating the term
Can anyone please guide me on how to implement Did You Mean Search
using indexes created from the supplied bunch of files as an input.
On 7/31/2013 11:15 AM, Ankit Murarka wrote:
Any help on this will be highly appreciated..I have been trying all
possible different option but to no avail.
Al
Hi Mike,
I retested and results are the same:
1/ I did not use sort (so FieldCache should not enter picture?)
2/ I created indexed data from scratch separately for 361 and 43
based on same text (text files), and I ran test from command
line separately against each index folder, so seems a
ok i see.
I tried the same test with randomized values on the numeric DV and now the
search speed is low and constant.
It's not gonna solve our issue since the values are relatively ordered in
our case but it's good to know.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 3
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Nicolas Guyot wrote:
> I have written a quick test to reproduce the slower sorting with numeric DV.
> In this test case, it happens only when reverse sorting.
Right - I bet your numeric field is relatively ordered in the index.
When this happens, there is always o
thanks Adrien for the explanation, it's really much appreciated.
I have written a quick test to reproduce the slower sorting with numeric
DV. In this test case, it happens only when reverse sorting.
About the sorting by page i mentioned, it was due to a mistake in our
testcase, sorry about that.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Zhang, Lisheng
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I did more tests with realistic text from different languages (typical
> text for 8 different languages, English one is novel "Animal Farm").
>
> What I found seems to be:
>
> ## Indexing:
> 36 and 43 comparable (your previous c
Hi,
There is a misunderstanding: Just by allocating a direct buffer, there is still
no difference to a heap buffer in the workflow!
NIO will read the data from file, copy it to FS cache and then the positional
read() system call (used by NIO) copies the FS cache contents to the direct
buffer,
I read this article "Use Lucene's MMapDirectory on 64bit platforms, please!"
and it said the MMapDirectory is better than other Directory because it will
void copy data between file system cache and java heap.
I checked the source code of NIOFSDirectory, and in new Buffer method it called
"Byt
