2013/5/29 Koji Sekiguchi
> Hi Rajesh,
>
> Thanks!
> I'm planning to open an NLP tool kit for Lucene, and the tool kit will
> include
> the following synonym library.
>
sounds nice, looking forward to it.
Tommaso
>
> koji
>
>
> (13/05/28 14:12), Rajesh Nikam wrote:
>
>> Hello Koji,
>>
>> This
Hi Koji,
Great news ! I am looking forward for this OpenNLP toolkit.
Thanks a lot !
Rajesh
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> Hi Rajesh,
>
> Thanks!
> I'm planning to open an NLP tool kit for Lucene, and the tool kit will
> include
> the following synonym library.
>
> k
Will update here if we finally decide to go with this. Looks like our
requirement can be accomplished with normal String fields
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Brendan Grainger <
brendan.grain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great, did it work?
>
> By the way, If found this article:
> http://blog.thetap
Adrein,
Thanks for spending time to explain me the things clearly. I have got the
things correctly now.
Thanks,
Arun
On 29-May-2013, at 2:13 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
>> Thanks for clarifying the things.
>> I have some doubts regarding so
Great, did it work?
By the way, If found this article:
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/02/is-your-indexreader-atomic-major.html very
helpful in understanding the difference between AtomicReaders and
CompositeReaders.
Brendan
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:30 AM, raj wrote:
> Thanks a lot Elisabeth
>
Hi Mike,
Thank you for the pointer, that is indeed the cause here.
The reason I added the rewrite was to preserve the boost of the field on
matches.
Specifically, some results have a field boost of log(popularity) and others
have a field boost of 100 to float them to the top.
Without the rewrit
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks!
I'm planning to open an NLP tool kit for Lucene, and the tool kit will include
the following synonym library.
koji
(13/05/28 14:12), Rajesh Nikam wrote:
Hello Koji,
This is seems pretty useful post on how to create synonyms file.
Thanks a lot for sharing this !
Have you sh
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying the things.
> I have some doubts regarding sorting :
>>
>> While you can do that, I don't recommend it. For example, if you have
>> 5 fields, loading all fields from stored fields requires at most 1
>> disk seek while loa
Hi Adrein,
Thanks for clarifying the things.
I have some doubts regarding sorting :
>
> While you can do that, I don't recommend it. For example, if you have
> 5 fields, loading all fields from stored fields requires at most 1
> disk seek while loading all fields from doc values requires at leas
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Arun Kumar K wrote:
> Hi Guys,
Hi,
> I have been trying to understand DocValues and get some hands on and have
> observed few things.
>
> I have added LongDocValuesField to the documents like:
> doc.add(new LongDocValuesField("id",1));
>
> 1> In 4.0 i saw that th
Hello all,
as some of you already know the Infinispan project includes several
integration points with the Apache Lucene project, including a
Directory implementation, but so far we had a separate community
because of the license incompatibility.
I'm very happy to announce now that both Infinispan
Hi Guys,
I have been trying to understand DocValues and get some hands on and have
observed few things.
I have added LongDocValuesField to the documents like:
doc.add(new LongDocValuesField("id",1));
1> In 4.0 i saw that there are two versions for docvalues,
RAM Resident(using Sources.getSO
Hi
I think that building the result tree is a good decision. And I think that
you can accomplish that by implementing a FacetResultsHandler which takes
the FacetArrays (that contains the counts for all categories) and builds
the result FacetResult including all tree sub-nodes.
You can find somewh
Hi,
I finished 3 of my 4 requirements.
* Indirect membership for list and hierarchical
* direct membership for flat list
I accomplished the flat list for direct memberships by indexing a second
category using another category path prefix and "id" in this case does not
contain any slash "/" e
Hi Shai,
you understood correctly, fantastic! You described my data representation
properly.
Yes, one document is a person and for each community there is a referenced
category, currently with hierachical String representation delemited by slash
"/", in the taxonomy index.
Yes, communities
What represents a document in the index, the persons? And each person is
associated with 0..N communities? And are communities hierarchical? So if I
have these two documents:
*P1
*
name: John Doe
communities: C1/C2, C4/C5/C6
*P2
*
name: John Smith
communities: C1/C3, C4/C7
Does that represent th
Hello Shai,
here my scenario:
There are persons. Each person can be a member of 0..n groups. On the frontend
there are 2 different views. One is hierarchical, the other one is a list
(flat). These groups should be shown as facets (how many persons are member of
a group).
A further option (on
Danny, can you try to describe your problem again? I don't think overriding
OrdinalPolicy is something that you want to do in general. If you can,
please provide a short example (even in text) with 1-2 documents, with
their facets and what you're trying to achieve.
Shai
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9
18 matches
Mail list logo
