Hello,
In my understanding, there is no explicit way to group/facet on
tokenized fields. We have older indices and are planning to implement
faceting on those indices. All the fields in the indices use a
ClassicAnalyzer and are tokenized.
Is there a work around, through whic
Hi folks,
We just created a new meetup group for all Lucene/Solr enthusiasts in and
around Bangalore. We're holding our first meetup on the 1st Of June, 2013.
Link to the meetup page -
http://www.meetup.com/Bangalore-Apache-Solr-Lucene-Group/ . Feel free to
join.
Here's the link to the first meet
Shai,
Looks like this is what I was looking for. Will try out
Thansk a lot!
Rajesh
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Raj,
>
> If I understand your question, you can integrate regular and faceted search
> as follows:
>
> Query q = new TermQuery("f", "word");
> TopDocsCollec
Raj,
If I understand your question, you can integrate regular and faceted search
as follows:
Query q = new TermQuery("f", "word");
TopDocsCollector tdc = TopScoreDocsCollector.create();
FacetsCollector fc = FacetsCollector.create();
searcher.search(q, MultiCollector.wrap(tdc, fc));
TopDocs topDoc
Is it possible to combine normal Lucene search and Facet Search?
I have seperately implemented basic search and also Faceted Search in my
project based on the sample provided. But a bit confused on how to query
the document content which also has associated Facets.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:3
> The problem is we can't reliably differentiate commit-in-progress from
> a corrupt first commit...
I think you can tell them apart with high probability because the checksum
is off by exactly one(at least in lucene 3.5 where I'm looking). It does
seem dangerous to rely on an implementation det
