Update DocValues and Query Time Join performance on DocValues

Hello everyone, I've seen in a couple of old presentations that DocValues will be updatable (without updating the whole document) but I cannot find anything recent on this. Is this currently possible on 4.2? Is there any example on how to do it? Also, I have the impression that Query Time Joins s

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

Thanks again for the help Mike. Much appreciated. Have a good one, Jeff -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Field-Index-deprecation-tp4050068p4050766.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:12 AM, jeffthorne wrote: > Thanks for the response Mike and pointing me in the right direction. > > I see that > > TextField is indexed, tokenized, without term vectors > StringField is indexed, but not tokenized > > > If I wanted a stored field that is tokenized with sto

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

Thanks for the response Mike and pointing me in the right direction. I see that TextField is indexed, tokenized, without term vectors StringField is indexed, but not tokenized If I wanted a stored field that is tokenized with stored term vectors would this be the recommended approach? FieldTy

Re: Field.Index deprecation ?

I think mike is in, ey uwe? ;) On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Igal Sapir wrote: > +1 > > I own a copy of 2nd Edition and will gladly purchase 3rd Edition when it's > out. > > -- > typos, misspels, and other weird words brought to you courtesy of my mobile > device and its auto-(in)correct feat

Re: Lucene reliability as primary store

Thanks Simon, I'll see if I can implement some kind of transaction log to avoid committing every change. Cheers, Pablo On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Pablo Guerrero wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm evaluating using Lucene for some data