Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
Here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4793 :) On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Samuel García Martínez < samuelgmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, of course i can. I'll try to open it this night (European Time) or > tomorrow as soon as I get to the office. > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2

Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
Yes, of course i can. I'll try to open it this night (European Time) or tomorrow as soon as I get to the office. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dyer, James wrote: > Samuel, > > Do you think you could write a failing unit test and open a JIRA issue? > Or at the least open a JIRA issue with all

Re: Is there a limit for a field size in Lucene 3.0.2

2013-02-21 Thread Erick Erickson
There's an overridable default of 10,000 tokens, that's the first place I'd look. Forget just how to set it to a higher value Best Erick. P.S. Please don't hit reply to a message and change the title, but start an e-mail fresh. See: http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack On Thu, Fe

Re: Grouping without block indexing

2013-02-21 Thread Michael McCandless
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy wrote: >> Can you give an example of what you mean by multi-level grouping? > > Say for instance, I have indexed a library, with the following fields. > published_year, language, genre, author and title. > > Now my objective would be group b

Is there a limit for a field size in Lucene 3.0.2

2013-02-21 Thread Mark Wilson
I am having an issue with an old Search Application we are using. We have a Search App (using Lucene 3.0.2) that queries an index generated by Nutch 1.3. There is a really long page (approx 124kb ) that is crawled and inserted into the index, but when I search for it, (using a web-based applicatio

RE: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Dyer, James
Samuel, Do you think you could write a failing unit test and open a JIRA issue? Or at the least open a JIRA issue with all the details without a test? James Dyer Ingram Content Group (615) 213-4311 -Original Message- From: Samuel García Martínez [mailto:samuelgmarti...@gmail.com] Sen

ProximityQueryNode

2013-02-21 Thread Carsten Schnober
Hi, I'm interested in the functionality supposedly implemented through ProximityQueryNode. Currently, it seems like it is not used by the default QueryParser or anywhere else in Lucene, right? This makes perfectly sense since I don't see a Lucene index store any notion of sentences, paragraphs, etc

Re: Grouping without block indexing

2013-02-21 Thread Ramprakash Ramamoorthy
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Michael McCandless < > > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > > >> Just use the 2-pass grouping if you

Re: Grouping without block indexing

2013-02-21 Thread Michael McCandless
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Just use the 2-pass grouping if you can't index your groups as a block of >> docs. >> >> See >> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_1_0/group

Re: Grouping without block indexing

2013-02-21 Thread Ramprakash Ramamoorthy
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Just use the 2-pass grouping if you can't index your groups as a block of > docs. > > See > http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_1_0/grouping/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/package-summary.html > for examples.

Re: possible bug on Spellchecker

2013-02-21 Thread Samuel García Martínez
I'm using Solr 3.6 and DirectSpellchecker is available only on v4+. Moreover, in "big" indexes i prefer using sidekick index rather than iterating over term dictionary. On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > Any reason that you are not using the DirectSpellChecker? > > See: > h