Hi Mike,
I have a question about your post "Searching relational content with Lucene's
BlockJoinQuery"
(http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2012/01/searching-relational-content-with.html).
I am
actually trying to use Lucene 4.0.0, so am having to translate your example to
the newer
ToParentBlockJo
Right. I understand that the TermFirstPassGroupingCollector is extended from
Collector class too. Let me try.
Many thanks to you!
-邮件原件-
发件人: martijn.is.h...@gmail.com [mailto:martijn.is.h...@gmail.com] 代表
Martijn v Groningen
发送时间: 2013年2月11日 19:29
收件人: java-user@lucene.apache.org
主题: Re:
Hey Ian. Thank you so much for the quick reply. I'll definitely give Lucene
a shot. I'll start off with it and get back to you in case of any problem.
Many thanks.
Warm Regards,
Tariq
https://mtariq.jux.com/
cloudfront.blogspot.com
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> You can ce
You can certainly use lucene for this, and it will be blindingly fast
even if you use a disk based index.
Just index documents as you've laid it out, with the field you want to
search on added as indexable and the others stored.
I've never used Guava Table so can't comment on that, but with only
Hi
Can anyone explain to me how to use ToParentBlockJoinCollector in Lucene 4.0.0?
I can successfully query with a ToParentBlockJoinQuery, but the results come
back are not grouped by parent doc. I believe that ToParentBlockJoinCollector
is the way to go, but I cannot make it work.
Is there s
Yes, that looks fine. As far as I'm aware the compression is low
level and transparent to user code.
--
Ian.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
>
>> StoredField does indeed only store the field, not index it.
>> Ma
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
> StoredField does indeed only store the field, not index it.
> MatchAllDocs will find it because, by definition, it matches all docs.
> But other queries won't.
>
That was pretty clear Ian. Thanks a lot.
>
> Not sure what you mean when you say y
Dear List,
I've made through the demo code for grouping search using
TermFirstPassGroupingCollector and TermSecondPassGroupingCollector.
However, the sorting of resulted groups is determined by the scores of the
top-one documents in each group. ( Everyone of these documents has the
highest sco
StoredField does indeed only store the field, not index it.
MatchAllDocs will find it because, by definition, it matches all docs.
But other queries won't.
Not sure what you mean when you say you are particular about stored
fields. If you need to get it back from the index, store it. If you
don
