On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Trejkaz wrote:
> It's not only protected... but the class is final as well (the method
> might as well be private so that it doesn't give a false sense of hope
> that it can be overridden.)
>
> I might have to clone the whole class just to make the method public.
W
I'm still confused by the semantics of PerFieldSimilarityWrapper. How can
the
queryNorm be independent of the Similarity? (at least in our case it isn't)
>From my understanding the current PerFieldSimilarityWrapper implementation
limits us to using Similarities that have the same queryNorm
impleme
Hi Ian,
Yes I/O ->CPU, but read on...
The throughput is about the same with similar i/o and 20% higher CPU. We have
plenty of CPU and I would rather be cpu bound, thean i/o bound.
However, we have increased the number of indexing threads in our application.
On Lucene 2.3.2, this gave no perfor
i see. i will try it..
tks
2012/11/9 David Pilato
> Hi Fabio,
>
>
> Did you consider using Hibernate Search? It's based on Lucene.
> It may help you.
>
> David.
>
> Le 9 novembre 2012 à 14:15, Fabio Ebner
> a écrit
> :
> > Hi.. can someone help me? i need to integrate LUCENE + SPRING + HIBERNA
Hi Fabio,
Did you consider using Hibernate Search? It's based on Lucene.
It may help you.
David.
Le 9 novembre 2012 à 14:15, Fabio Ebner a écrit
:
> Hi.. can someone help me? i need to integrate LUCENE + SPRING + HIBERNATE
> and don't find any articlhe about this..
>
> tks
--
David Pilato
htt
Hi Ian,
Thank you, figure it out last night a piece legacy code closes the TermDoc
in every loop. Somehow the old version was fine with it.
Regards
--
Bin Lan
Software Developer
Perimeter E-Security
O - (203)541-3412
Follow Us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PerimeterNews
Read Our Blog: security.p
Hi.. can someone help me? i need to integrate LUCENE + SPRING + HIBERNATE
and don't find any articlhe about this..
tks
Feels a bit of a hack, but you might be able to make it work by
storing the field name when MyPerFieldxxx.get(name) is called and
using that in MyPerFieldxxx.queryNorm() and coord() calls to do the
right thing, either inline or via the relevant Similarity subclass,
identified by the name.
--
Ian.
By far the most likely cause is that something somewhere in your code
is closing the searcher or the reader.
--
Ian.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Bin Lan wrote:
> We recently upgrade our lucene library from 1.9.1 to 3.6.1 and we run into
> multiple AlreadyClosedException when doing search.
Are you getting the same, improved or worse performance/throughput?
Has the bottleneck switched from IO to CPU?
--
Ian.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:40 PM, kiwi clive wrote:
> Having played with merge parameters and various index parameters, it seems
> possible to change the I/O usage at the cos
On 11/09/2012 09:41 AM, jake dsouza wrote:
Hello,
Has any one worked on making Lucene index and search versioned document
collections i.e any corpus with multiple versions of documents similar to
wikipedia or source code.
I am working on a project to index and search versioned collections while
11 matches
Mail list logo