It depends on whether the query parser is smart enough to optimize away
empty boolean terms. Otherwise, the semantics of "x AND y" (or BooleanQuery
with two "MUST" clauses) is the intersection of the documents selected by
matching x and the documents selected by matching y. If y selects no
docu
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Well, if you have defined OR/or and IN/in as stopwords, what is it you expect
> other than for the analyzer to ignore those terms (which with a boolean “AND”
> means match nothing)?
Is this behaviour really logical?
If I search for a sing
Well, if you have defined OR/or and IN/in as stopwords, what is it you expect
other than for the analyzer to ignore those terms (which with a boolean “AND”
means match nothing)?
What does your constructor look like for ClassicAnalyzer – do you pass in an
explict stop word set or nothing, which
Hi all,
This is driving me crazy. In my data if I search "state" AND "GA" I get
hits. If I search "state" AND "OR" or "state" AND "IN" I get no hits even
though I can see examples of state AND IN in the content. I've tried
searching with "in" in lower case and quotes to no avail.
The data is
Hi,
Best Buy is building new Search Platform/Eco-System powered by Lucene/Solr.
We are hiring multiple Lucene/Solr engineers, tech leads, and architects,
both full-time and consulting based in Minneapolis, MN. This is a long term
project and the team is fun to work with.
Please reach out to me if
