I am using Lucene and i have one question about it
I am using Snowball analyzer with English version.
My index has below columns
(1) id
(2) Content
i.e
Id Content
_
1 This is murder case and murdering is crime
2 The wife of a Mumbai
Thanks so much..KeywordAnalyzer works fine with exact match...
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Brusic wrote:
> The snowball analyzer will not work since it analyzes the field. Use
> the KeywordAnalyzer, which will preserve the text as is.
>
> --
> Ivan
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Y
The snowball analyzer will not work since it analyzes the field. Use
the KeywordAnalyzer, which will preserve the text as is.
--
Ivan
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Yogesh patel
wrote:
> I used SnowBall Analyzer with English language.In snowball analyzer is it
> possible?
>
>
> On Mon, May 7,
Note: I'm bound to lucene 3.0.3 for the context of this question, but
I would be interested to know if newer versions would help me here.
I have an existing document in my directory that has one regular
String field and one numeric field. I naively thought I could update
that document to change
Note: I'm bound to lucene 3.0.3 for the context of this question, but
I would be interested to know if newer versions would help me here.
I have an existing document in my directory that has one regular
String field and one numeric field. I naively thought I could update
that document to change
I wrote mongodb rest server with lucene search
Would be happy if anyone try it
https://sites.google.com/site/mongodbjavarestserver/home
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
greg@localhost ~ $ java -version
java version "1.7.0_04"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_04-b20)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.0-b21, mixed mode)
greg@localhost ~ $ uname -a
Linux localhost 2.6.39 #4 SMP Sun Aug 21 13:53:29 PDT 2011 x86_64
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2820QM C
Hi Greg,
I don't see that problem - 'ant generate-maven-artifacts' just works for me.
I suspect that the XSLT processor included with your JDK does not support the
EXSLT str:split functionality used in the lucene/site/xsl/index.xsl stylesheet,
which is invoked from the 'process-webpages' target
For me ant generate-maven-artifacts if giving me this error, any thoughts ?
-- %< --
process-webpages:
[xslt] Processing /home/greg/projects/lucene-solr/lucene/build.xml
to /home/greg/projects/lucene-solr/lucene/build/docs/index.html
[xslt] Loading stylesheet
/home/greg/projects/luce
If you use the Lucene/Solr Maven POMs to drive the build, I committed a major
change last night (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3948 for
more details):
* 'ant get-maven-poms' no longer places pom.xml files under the lucene/ and
solr/ directories. Instead, they are placed in a
Let me leave,3q~
2012/5/8 Li Li
> But this only get (term1 or term2 or term3. ). you can't
> implement (term1 or term2 ...) and (term3 or term4) by this method.
> maybe you should writer your own Scorer to deal with this kind of queries.
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Li Li wrote:
> >
But this only get (term1 or term2 or term3. ). you can't
implement (term1 or term2 ...) and (term3 or term4) by this method.
maybe you should writer your own Scorer to deal with this kind of queries.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Li Li wrote:
> disjunction query is much slower than conjuct
disjunction query is much slower than conjuction query. That's why
many search engine use conjuction as default.
by the way, you say you have 5,000,000 documents. how many documents
match your query? do you need sort by relevant score or just want to
match and don't care sort?
if you don't care sor
Hi all,
I want to speed up my searches by using multiple CPU cores for one
search. I saw that there is a possibility to use multithreaded search by
passing an ExecutorService to the IndexSearcher:
idxSearcher = new IndexSearcher(reader,
Executors.newCachedThreadPool());
I call my searc
Thanks for you reply,firstly. So many or query is to monitor the
term.One scene is that:if i want to know cities of a province and events that
happens, I may instantiate the query like "(California or NewYork or
SanFransico or SomePlace) and (Pollution or Criminal ... or Alcohol)".
a disjunction (or) query of so many terms is indeed slow.
can u describe your real problem? why you should the disjunction
results of so many terms?
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:57 PM, qibaoy...@126.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I met a problem about how to search many keywords in about 5,000,000
> do
16 matches
Mail list logo