I am using Lucene 3.5. I want to create around 30 million documents.
While doing Indexing I am getting the following Exception:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: after flush: fdx size mismatch: 7442
docs vs 32768 length in bytes of _ct.fdx file exists?=true
at
org.apache.luce
Which file should i go and set:
-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8886,server=y,suspend=y ?
thanks!
hao
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h.
While we are in constant sync due to the merge, lucene would still be
updated multiple times before a solr 4 release, and it would be subject to
happen at any time - so its really not any different.
On Wednesday, December 7, 2011, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> Yeah, biggest issue for us is we're using t
Thank you for the pointer. I looked into nested documents, but it
appears that the implementation relies on each parent document being
indexed immediately before all of its children. Unfortunately, this
presents two problems:
1. Any optimize operation will break nesting
2. Deleting and reindexing
anytime you see nosuchmethoderror, it means its a bug in your
configuration (wrong, out of date classes/jar files)
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Stephen Howe wrote:
> I've been playing around with Lucene's MemoryIndex and anytime I try to use
> index.addField(String, String, Analyzer), I
> rece
Hi,
You mixed incompatible jar file versions of Lucene 4.0 modules. Try to
recompile everything from source.
Uwe
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Stephen Howe schrieb:
I've been playing around with Lucene's MemoryIndex and anytime I try to use
index
I've been playing around with Lucene's MemoryIndex and anytime I try to use
index.addField(String, String, Analyzer), I
receive: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.lucene.util.BytesRef.deepCopyOf(Lorg/apache/lucene/util/BytesRef;)Lorg/apache/lucene/util/BytesRef;
anytime I make a call to it. I
Have you read http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/07/18/the-spanquery/?
Might help explain some of the behaviour you are seeing.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Trejkaz wrote:
> Supposing I have a document with just "hi there" as the text.
>
> If I do a span query like this:
>
>
It is conceivable that nested documents might help.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454. I don't know
anything about that so might be way off target.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Brandon Mintern wrote:
> We have a document tagging system where documents are composed o
Hi,
A few days ago I asked a similar question:
1) in coming lucene 4.0, there is a feature sort like payload in document level:
>lucene 4 has a feature called IndexDocValues which is essentially a
> payload per document per field.
>
> you can read about it here:
> http://www.searchworkings.org/b
See http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ImproveSearchingSpeed. Some of
the tips relate to indexing but most to search time stuff.
--
Ian.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Dilshad K. P. wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any thing to take care while creating index for improving lucene
> text search speed
Ian, thank you for your suggestions.
I have looked to the TermEnum and TermDocs, but they don't offer a
combination with terms and frequencies (used by our autocompleter class)
from a filtered set of docs.
Eventually I implemented the following solution:
- In the source index, get all terms f
Hi,
Is there any thing to take care while creating index for improving lucene text
search speed.
Thanks And Regards
Dilshad K.P
* Confidentiality Statement/Disclaimer *
This message and any attachments is intended for the sole use of the intended
recipient. It may contain confidential i
13 matches
Mail list logo
