Take a look at admin/analysis to see what happens when. What do
you mean by "apply a PorterStemFilter"? At index time? Query time?
The analysis page will let you look at what the terms look after they've
gone through your analysis chain, and the answer may be obvious
then
All that said, you c
It seems that when I use a PorterStemFilter in my custom analyser, wildcard
searches malfunction.
As an example, I have the words "appendicitis" and "sensitisation" in our
content. When I enter a query of "a*itis" I would expect to have
"appendicitis" match but instead I get "sensitisation" and n
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Felipe Carvalho
wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, Erick! Any pointer to any article showing how to use it?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 21http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing, 2011 at 10:49 AM,
> Erick Erickson wrote:
>
Thanks for the tip, Erick! Any pointer to any article showing how to use it?
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You might take a look at grouping, aka field collapsing. Faceting gives
> you counts for various values in a field, but not a mixture of documents,
> wher
You might take a look at grouping, aka field collapsing. Faceting gives
you counts for various values in a field, but not a mixture of documents,
whereas grouping will return you the top N members of each group
which sounds like what you're after.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Ian L
Running two queries is fine, as is looping through the results list.
I don't think it is clear that one in necessarily "better" than the
other. Faceting generally works by looping through results because
you typically don't know in advance what values will be present.
--
Ian,
2011/11/21 liugang
The general recommendation is to run the query again but you are right
that it isn't always the correct answer in all circumstances. If you
want to guard against the scenario you outline, do it the way you
suggest, That's fine. In your fluid environment how do you cope when
doc #11 is no longer
thanks for uwe's answer.
--
gang liu
email: liuga...@gmail.com
At 2011-11-20 17:44:06,"Uwe Schindler" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Lucene only uses CFS for very small segments, that don't exceed a specific
>percentage of the index size. See the method LogMergePolicy.setNoCFSRatio
>[http://lucene.apache.or
hi,faceted search is like group by in SQL, and also need query two time to get
two list in your situation. I think there isn't better way to solve your
problem.
--
gang liu
email: liuga...@gmail.com
At 2011-11-21 09:35:08,"Felipe Carvalho" wrote:
>Hello,
> I'm working on a people finder a
