Upgrade Path Lucene 3.0.2 to 3.4

2011-11-16 Thread Paul Allan Hill
As it says in the title, we are moving from 3.0.2 from to 3.4. I am interested in issues about the need to build a new index or just keep changing the current one. My company has been busy building software and have not upgraded the Lucene and Tika libraries since last year, but I'm trying to

RE: Index Corruption with Lucene 2.9.3

2011-11-16 Thread nishesh.gupta
Hi Uwe, I ran my setup with JDK1.6.0_29 . Exception that I get - 2011-11-15 23:54:24,518 [MC:10.10.176.148-1321429549689-426 FS:emag_393219_0] ERROR indexer - MergeWithFiler: MC: 393219, shard 0, guid 10.10.176.148-1321429549689-426: Error in addIndex()/kazMaybeMerge(): /sideline/fs_393219/ca

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Chris Hostetter
: "Think of the Query DSL as an AST of queries" : http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/query-dsl/ I'm not familiar with ES, but FWIW: based on that one page the "Query DSL" doesn't really sound much more powerful then what you can do with nested queries, local params, and param refs usin

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Jason Rutherglen
The docs are slim on examples. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Peter Karich wrote: > >>> even high complexity as ES supports lucene-like query nesting via JSON >> That sounds interesting.  Where is it described in the ES docs?  Thanks. > > "Think of the Query DSL as an AST of queries" > http://w

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Peter Karich
>> even high complexity as ES supports lucene-like query nesting via JSON > That sounds interesting. Where is it described in the ES docs? Thanks. "Think of the Query DSL as an AST of queries" http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/query-dsl/ For further info ask on ES mailing list. Reg

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Jason Rutherglen
> even high complexity as ES supports lucene-like query nesting via JSON That sounds interesting. Where is it described in the ES docs? Thanks. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Peter Karich wrote: >  Hi, > > its not really fair to compare NRT of Solr to ElasticSearch. > ElasticSearch provides

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Peter Karich
Hi, its not really fair to compare NRT of Solr to ElasticSearch. ElasticSearch provides NRT for distributed indices as well... also when doing heavy indexing Solr lacks real NRT. The only main disadvantages of ElasticSearch are: * only one (main) committer * no autowarming > the ES team in t

Re: Suggest with FST

2011-11-16 Thread Dawid Weiss
I am currently working on a refactoring of FSTLookup so that either one or both of your objectives will be possible. I would still argue that storing exact scores does not make much sense (think: if you collect query logs then you probably won't differentiate between two suggestions that differ by

Suggest with FST

2011-11-16 Thread Sudarshan Gaikaiwari
Hi I am trying to implement an auto complete suggest system using FST. For my use case I cannot use FSTLookup for the following reasons. 1. I cannot construct the display string using the arc labels like FSTLookup as the display strings for autocompletion are different from the strings used as pr

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Shashi Kant wrote: > I had posted this earlier on this list, hope this provides some answers > > http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/ Except it's an out of date comparison. We have NRT (near real time search) in Solr no

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Shashi Kant
I had posted this earlier on this list, hope this provides some answers http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/ On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Federico Fissore wrote: > Peyman Faratin, il 16/11/2011 15:12, ha scritto: > > Hi >> >> A client is conside

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Federico Fissore
Peyman Faratin, il 16/11/2011 15:12, ha scritto: Hi A client is considering moving from Lucene to ElasticSearch. What is the community's opinion on ES? thank you we have recently compared ES to Solr to estimate the effort of evolving our search infrastructure (it was game like: two teams t

Re: ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Bill Mitchell
Under the covers, ElasticSearch contains mutliple lucene indexes -- so the full expressiveness of lucene queries are translatable to ElasticSearch -- but the benefit of using ES as an abstraction layer to give sharded searches is something attractive enough that we're looking at it too. ;) We typ

ElasticSearch

2011-11-16 Thread Peyman Faratin
Hi A client is considering moving from Lucene to ElasticSearch. What is the community's opinion on ES? thank you Peyman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-use