I tried it and it worked, although it's having one peculiarity.
When I search for Item_1 : it gives me 110 hits but when I use *Item_1* it
gives me 0 hits. What mistake am I doing here?
Also when I search for *341* it is giving me correct results i.e
0341-000-000-DR
but it's not working for a
As far as I understand you have 2 different problems.
1. search and 2.4 index with 3.2 code using standard analyzer.
in this case you should either reindex or pass Version.LUCENE_24 to
the StandardAnalyzer ctor that should help here.
2. search a string with parentheses with the query parser
you s
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Sujit Pal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently in need of a LowerCaseFilter and StopFilter that will
> recognize KeywordAttribute, similar to the way PorterStemFilter
> currently does (on trunk). Specifically, in case the term is a
> KeywordAttribute.isKeyword(), it
For the searches I want to run on my index I want to return all matching
documents (as opposed to N top hits).
My first naïve approach was just to use Searcher.search(query, filter,
Integer.MAX_VALUE, sort) that is, pass Integer.MAX_VALUE for the number
of possible docs to return. That unfortu
Hi All:
I am new to Lucene and my project is to provide specialized search for a
set
of booklets. I am using Lucene Java 3.1.
The basic idea is to run queries to find out what booklet and page
numbers are
match in order to help people know where to look for information in the
(rather
large
Hi,
I have a use-case where a single Document in Lucene contains a single
NumericField that could potentially have a 100s of 1000s of values.
Values are being added to a document instance like so:
List fields = // get fields, possibly 100s of 1000s
with the same name, but a diffe
I'm not intimately familiar with FVH myself, but that sounds reasonable.
Tests usually don't lie. I'd definitely like to see a patched version
that avoids that!
Itamar.
On 22/06/2011 05:29, Michael Sokolov wrote:
OK - it seems as if there is a blow-up in FieldPhraseList if a
document has a la
For the searches I want to run on my index I want to return all matching
documents (as opposed to N top hits).
My first naïve approach was just to use Searcher.search(query, filter,
Integer.MAX_VALUE, sort) that is, pass Integer.MAX_VALUE for the number of
possible docs to return. That unfort
Hello,
I am currently in need of a LowerCaseFilter and StopFilter that will
recognize KeywordAttribute, similar to the way PorterStemFilter
currently does (on trunk). Specifically, in case the term is a
KeywordAttribute.isKeyword(), it should not lowercase and remove
respectively.
This can be ach
Here is a follow-up. This is a larger example of some of the text I'm
searching in my index:
The quoted name/value pairs are in the index.
"
middleName="D", zip="", lastName="ADAMSON", street="00 SOME ST",
addAssociates="true", state="CA", city="ROCHESTER", source="SOMESOURCE",
person_user="TES
That was it, thanks!!!
Dean
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lea [mailto:ian@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:35 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: I have seen this exception on some posts around but don't see the
cause/solution(RamDirectory)..
At a guess you are
I read that in a lot of cases IndexWriter.optimize does not have to be called.
I then deleted it and my junit test case broke because results were coming back
in the query that were not supposed to be coming back :(. I think everything
is single tested. Maybe I should write a more raw junit te
Hi!
I would like to announce the release of RankingAlgorithm exposed as
Lucene 3.2.0 api and would like to invite you to try it out. Since
RankingAlgorithm is exposed as the Lucene API, no code changes are
needed. Just download the new lucene-core-3.2.0.jar and the
rankingalgorithm.jar, drop
Hi all,
I have some questions about searching 3.2. I have just upgraded from 2.4.1
to 3.2. I am using the standard analyzer to create the index and to search,
and one of the fields is called "querytext" and it has content like this
among other things: phoneNumber="(904) 555-1212". I've tried many d
Hi!
I would like to announce the availability of Solr 3.2 with
RankingAlgorithm. Please download and give the new version a try. This
version of RankingAlgorithm exposes a lucene compatible api so almost
all of Solr features should work as it is.
Note:
NRT support will be available by next
Hey guys,
I've been a big fan of Lucene and have been working with it for sometime.
While trying to use Lucene I often found myself scouring the web, javadoc,
source code, and this mailing list for answers to many of the questions I
had. I wished there was a site where I could find solutions to c
> Which of the solutions did you find to work better?
> Can you please say which package should I change it to if I
> choose to do it
> that way?
I think changing package name of ComplexQueryParser is easier. This way you can
use existing patch directly.
Plus, do you mind voting https://issues.a
OK, after some sorting fieldCache has some entries and also all other caches.
Next I called optimize which started a new searcher.
All caches a cleared, _except_ fieldCache.
I then started a GC with jconsole and the logfile reported "Full GC".
The heap reduced its size but the fieldCache is _stil
So, you are reading 100 million records from somewhere and are writing
each record to one of 1 million indexes? Really 1 million, with an
average of 100 docs in each? 17 hours doesn't sound too bad to me.
Before worrying about lucene performance you should double check
everything else - in general
What does Luke show as being indexed for that field? Other useful
tips at
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Why_am_I_getting_no_hits_.2BAC8_incorrect_hits.3F
If that field is numeric you could use a NumericField - gets rid of
problems with leading zeros.
If by "I just want to get eve
At a guess you are trying to open a searcher on a RAMDirectory that
doesn't yet contain anything. Files only get written when stuff is
added to an index and the writer is closed or committed.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Hiller, Dean x66079
wrote:
> Anyone know how to do a simpl
[20110601 TO ] is the way to do it, because these are string
fields being checked with string comparisons. If your numbers are
variable length you will need to pad them.
Or look at NumericField and NumericRangeQuery. Faster and better.
--
Ian.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Hiller,
I can always use * , ?
But here I am not talking of this. I just want to get everything which has
341 in it. How to do it without * or ?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Pranav goyal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am in a fix regarding lucene search. I know a little bit about lucene and
> have successfu
Hi all,
I am in a fix regarding lucene search. I know a little bit about lucene and
have successfully created index and searched a lot of queries on that.
My main worry is that whenever I search for let say "000" it doesn't give me
any result while if I seach for "0341" it'll give me a hit. Ev
24 matches
Mail list logo
