Sorry, wrong email ;)
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Hmm, this sounds hairy :)
>
> Are you sure NRTCachingDir won't work for you?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:58
Hmm, this sounds hairy :)
Are you sure NRTCachingDir won't work for you?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ganesh wrote:
> Is it a bad idea to keep multiple shards in a single system?
>
> Regards
> Ganesh
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "T
Is it a bad idea to keep multiple shards in a single system?
Regards
Ganesh
- Original Message -
From: "Toke Eskildsen"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Index size and performance degradation
> On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 10:10 +0200, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
>> The
On Sunday 12 June 2011 22:12:01 Michael McCandless wrote:
> Anyway, I don't think that's a good tradeoff, in general, for our
> users, because very few apps truly require immediate consistency from
> Lucene (can anyone give an example where their app depends on
> immediate consistency...?
For data
First of all I should probably congratulate my fellow Germans -- Dirk
Nowitzki's outstanding performance during this year's NBA finals will
become part of the history of basketball. As a Pole, I admit I'm
really freaking jealous.
Now... back to the subject.
A number of people have expressed an in
Partitioning and replication are the keys to handling data and user volumes
respectively.
However, this approach introduces some other concerns over consistency and
availability of content which I've tried to capture
here: http://www.slideshare.net/MarkHarwood/patterns-for-large-scale-search
Th
Thanks. Our product is pretty generic and we can't assume much on the
hardware, as well as on usage. Some users would want low latency, others
will prefer throughput. My job is to make as little compromise as
possible...
As for SSD, thats generally a good advice, except they seem to be
faili
We tried with more than 50 shards in the single system. Having multiple small
index, indexes and optimizes the content faster. We use ParallelMultiSearcher
to search across the index and the performance is really good. Now we plan to
move to 64 Bit, so that we could use more RAM.
Regards
Ganesh
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 10:10 +0200, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> The whole point of my question was to find out if and how to make
> balancing on the SAME machine. Apparently thats not going to help and at
> a certain point we will just have to prompt the user to buy more hardware...
It really dep
