No problems... I was trying to get the results to be reverse ordered, but I
had a small problem in my searcher to work... Now all works...
Thanks :)
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Alexander Aristov [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2949011-1603567638-376...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> indeed. What's the prob
indeed. What's the problem?
Best Regards
Alexander Aristov
On 16 May 2011 16:43, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> The problem we have is that you dont really say what your problem is! Whats
> wrong with the search results you get? Give an example of the query you
> execute and the documents you have.
>
The problem we have is that you dont really say what your problem is! Whats
wrong with the search results you get? Give an example of the query you
execute and the documents you have.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -O
I was under an assumption that edge n-grams speed up the prefix queries, but
now it seems that it is not so... Am I right in thinking so ?
Are there any relation between n-grams and prefix queries ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/What-is-the-relation-betwee
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> At any rate, I think all you need to do is specify
> the reverse boolean in the SortField c'tor???
>
> Best
> Erick
>
>
The "true" in
`Sort srt = new Sort(new SortField(null,SortField.DOC,true)); `
actually is the reverse boolean sort field. So it is turned on, but
hi Julien ,
I m not sure what do u mean by
"SOLR is now used by default for indexing in Nutch." Does that mean SOLR has
integrated Nutch for crawling web resources?
I checked SOLR wiki but i didnt see something like that, Could u please
provide some details ?
--
View this message in context:
Ahhh, I probably should have read more carefully!
At any rate, I think all you need to do is specify
the reverse boolean in the SortField c'tor???
Best
Erick
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:12 AM, shrinath.m wrote:
>
> Erick Erickson wrote:
>>
>> Why do you want to do this? the internal doc ids are
>
Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Why do you want to do this? the internal doc ids are
> transient. If you update a document by delete/add, the
> internal id will now be different. What I'm getting at is
> that I'd like to be sure the use case here does what
> you think it will because this smells like a
Why do you want to do this? the internal doc ids are
transient. If you update a document by delete/add, the
internal id will now be different. What I'm getting at is
that I'd like to be sure the use case here does what
you think it will because this smells like an XY problem,
see:
http://people.apa
bq: Just curious. How would this version be published if there are
missing jar and there are compiling errors?
Well, the fact that it has been published probably means that you've
missed a step somewhere. There'd have been howls of outrage if
something as egregious as this were the case
That
What I want:
docids that matched the search string are :
5
4
3
2
1
What I am getting :
docids that matched the search string are :
999
998
997
996
995
I am lucene sort object, and it is constructed like this :
Sort srt = new Sort(new SortField(null,SortField.DOC,true));
How do I get wh
> I dont see any activities on Nutch wiki so wondering if its not being
> developed anymore. But most forums say Nutch is standard for solr.
>
Looking at the mail archives is a good clue of whether a project is still
alive or not. In the case of Nutch, the project is active as you can see on
the l
Just curious. How would this version be published if there are missing jar and
there are compiling errors?
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:15 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene 3.3 in Eclipse
(Resending to
Steve, the two links are really helpful. I still have a few questions:
1) The import statement, import
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.standard.parser.StandardSyntaxParser, doesn't
work because the StandardSyntaxParser.java is not available.
Do you know where to download it?
2) The CharStream cl
14 matches
Mail list logo
