Hi,
Is there any reason why one would *not* want to reuse Query instances?
I'm using MemoryIndex with a fixed set of queries and I'm executing them all on
each new document that comes in. Because each document needs to have many tens
of thousands of queries executed against it, I thought I'd j
Hi,
I'm happy to announce the release of Luke 3.1.0. This release is based
on Lucene 3.1.0. Binaries and source code are available from the
project's page at Google Code:
http://code.google.com/p/luke/
Changes in version 3.1.0 (released on 2011.04.30):
* Issue 35: Lucene 3.1 compatible luke
Thanks Dawid. – Steve
From: dawid.we...@gmail.com [mailto:dawid.we...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dawid
Weiss
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 4:45 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Steven A Rowe
Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information
This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it wasn't
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>> Hmm maybe that is enough, Im not sure. I'm profiling with YourkitProfiler
>> and it doesnt show anything within the lucene classes so I assumed this
>> meant they didnt contain the neccessary debugging info but I would have
>> thought that -g
Hello,
I went to look at the "Hudson nightly builds" and tried to follow the link from
the main Lucene page
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/developer-resources.html#Nightly
The links to the Clover Test Coverage Reports point to
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Lucene/job/Lucene-
This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it wasn't forwarded to the
list, apparently).
Dawid
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Taylor
Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information
To: Dawid Weiss
On 29/04/2011 15:17, Dawid Weiss w
Hi Paul,
On 4/29/2011 at 4:14 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> On 29/04/2011 16:03, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> > What did you find about Luke that's buggy? Bug reports are very
> > useful; please contribute in this way.
>
> Please see previous post, in summary mistake on my part.
Okay... Which previous post
On 29/04/2011 21:14, Paul Taylor wrote:
Hmm maybe that is enough, Im not sure. I'm profiling with
YourkitProfiler and it doesnt show anything within the lucene classes
so I assumed this meant they didnt contain the neccessary debugging
info but I would have thought that -g is all I need
tha
Instead of profiling, provide some more info about the following:
- what are the problematic (slow) queries -- are they generated from the
code, are they parsed from text? What are they? Certain query types are
slow(er) than other query types.
- what is the index built from? Natural language (tex
On 29/04/2011 16:03, Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Paul,
What did you find about Luke that's buggy? Bug reports are very useful; please
contribute in this way.
Please see previous post, in summary mistake on my part.
The official Lucene 3.0.3 distribution jars were compiled using the -g cmdline
a
Hi Otis,
Thanks for trying out. From what I see, the problem is at all not in
MemoryIndex, so I suggest that you replace the mergeSort by quicksort again
(for MemoryIndex, see below). The problem seem to be the comparators that's
are in those Queries, which have no tie-breaker. MergeSort can handl
Hi,
Yeah, that's what we were going to do, but instead we did:
* changed MemoryIndex to use ArrayUtil.mergeSort
* ran the up and did a thread dump that shows that SorterTemplate.quickSort in
deep recursion again!
* looked for other places where this call is made - found it in
MultiPhraseQuery$Mu
Hi Paul,
What did you find about Luke that's buggy? Bug reports are very useful; please
contribute in this way.
The official Lucene 3.0.3 distribution jars were compiled using the -g cmdline
argument to javac - by default, though, only line number and source file
information is generated. If
> lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using
> luke
> > but find it incredibly buggy and of little use
>
Can you expand on this too? What kind of "incredible bugs" did you see?
Without feedback there is little progress, so bug reports count.
Dawid
Hey paul,
you can simply checkout the tag or download the sources right?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_3_0_3/
or http://ftp.download-by.net/apache//lucene/java/3.0.3/
simon
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> Is there a built debug version of lucene 3
Hi,
I've just started using the ComplexPhraseQueryParser and it works great with
one field but is there a way for it to work with multiple fields? For example,
right now the query:
job_title: "sales man*" AND NOT contact_name: "Chris Salem"
throws this exception
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.que
Don't know if this helps, but debugging stuff like this I simply add a
(manually inserted or aspectj-injected) recursion count, add a breakpoint
inside an if checking for recursion count >> X and run the vm with an
attached socket debugger. This lets you run at (nearly) full speed and once
you hit
maybe http://youdebug.kenai.com/ could be useful. If you are lucky you could
get it to set a breakpoint when the recursive call has reached depth X.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OK, so it looks like it's not MemoryIndex and its C
Patrick if the question is about the code snippert at the page you mention,
which I copy below, I believe the answer is no and the author is aware of it
since he is adding a comment about not-normalized in the second example.
ScoreDocs and TopDocs are not returning normalized scores.
Normalized
Hi,
OK, so it looks like it's not MemoryIndex and its Comparator that are funky.
After switching from quickSort call in MemoryIndex to mergeSort, the problem
persists:
'1205215856@qtp-684754483-7' Id=18, RUNNABLE on lock=, total cpu
time=497060.ms user time=495210.msat
org.apache.luc
Can anybody provide me some information about it ? Even a small clue, I'm
kinda stuck on this and the owner of the libraries do not answer emails.
Thanks
On 28 April 2011 13:49, Patrick Diviacco wrote:
> Is Okapi BM25 (its implementation in Lucene:
> nlp.uned.es/~jperezi/Lucene-BM25) returning
Is there a built debug version of lucene 3.0.3 so I can profile it
properly to find what part of the search is taking the time.
Note:Ive already profiled by application and determined that it is the
lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using
luke but find it incred
Hi,
You can create three fields for a document to index e.g.
Fields => parent_id parent_textchild_text
Contents =>1 low pressure engine wheel,
etc
2 Electronics laptop
pc ...
Hello,
I need an advice on how to create an document that has parent-child
relationship. Here is an example:
"low pressure" -> "engine"
-> "wheel"
->
"low pressure" string is the parent and "engine" and "wheel" are
children. I'd like to be able to
24 matches
Mail list logo
