There are solutions to solve the initialization problem. The JVM guarantees
> that an object is consistent after the ctor is run, so you can do the
> initialization like this (please note the double {{}}, which is an inline
> ctor, this is also often seen for unmodifiable HashSets):
>
> final OpenB
There are solutions to solve the initialization problem. The JVM guarantees
that an object is consistent after the ctor is run, so you can do the
initialization like this (please note the double {{}}, which is an inline
ctor, this is also often seen for unmodifiable HashSets):
final OpenBitSet myb
Thanks. Your project looks interesting. We've got some duplicate home-grown
stuff here that is similar.
As far as thread-safety, if one thread initializes an OpenBitSet's by setting
one or bits and then hands that off to another thread, the other thread may see
partial results. The long[] is
Nader, John P, il 27/04/2011 20:28, ha scritto:
Hello,
We have an application that relies heavily on caching OpenBitSets for reuse
across multiple threads, and therefore multiple threads.
[...]
You don't need synchronization if you just read from an openbitset. And
if you need to modify it,
This would be very useful to have, but I don't think Lucene has it
now. Maybe Solr does? If not, please submit a patch :)
Or, maybe try http://sna-projects.com/kamikaze? I think the focus
there is compressed docID sets (in RAM), so I'm not sure you'll find
something there... but, maybe?
Mike
Hello,
We have an application that relies heavily on caching OpenBitSets for reuse
across multiple threads, and therefore multiple threads. I am looking into
ways for making this both efficient and thread safe. In Java, the Immutable
pattern is the most efficient way to make a cached object t
Ranjit,
The problem is definitely the analyzer you are passing to QueryParser or
MultiFieldQueryParser, and not the parser itself.
The following tests succeed using KeywordAnalyzer, which is a pass-through
analyzer (the output is the same as the input):
public void testSharpQP() throws Excep
Hi,
while creating index with the help of lucene standardAnalyzer, we cannot make
difference between c, c++ and c# as lucene do not create index for c++ and c#.
To make the difference between these term I need to change the grammar of
lucene with the help of jFlex, it force me to create my own
