I have changed the code according to MIGRATE.txt
but now i am getting an error at
public long getCorpCount(Vector clauses)
{
long count=0;
try {
SpanQuery [] clause= new SpanQuery[clauses.size()];
clause= clauses.toArray(clause);
//SpanNear
On Mar 22, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Dawn Zoë Raison wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Before I run off and reinvent the wheel here - has anyone done any form of
> result grouping with lucene?
>
> My use case looks something like this:
> Newspaper pages are stored as documents in the lucene index.
> I need to li
Hi,
If I understand correctly what you are trying to do as far as getting corpusTF,
you might want to look at the implementation of the "-t" flag in
org.apache.lucene.misc/HighFreqTerms.java in contib.
Take a look at the getTotalTermFreq method in trunk.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene
> I'm searching for things near your location (as specified
> by longitude and latitude). I've got the search
> working correctly (with the help of NumericField), but now I
> need to sort the results by distance from you. The
> closer things appear at the top of the list.
There is a contrib pac
I'm trying to sort on two dependent fields. I realize that if they were
independent I could use new Sort(SortField...) with lots of SortFields,
but I need to compute something based on two fields.
Let me explain:
I'm searching for things near your location (as specified by longitude
and lati
MIGRATE.txt is here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/MIGRATE.txt
DocsEnum doesn't have a "getSpans()", so you mean you're hitting a
compilation error?
Maybe step back a bit and describe what you're trying to do...?
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Mar 2
No. Certainly not for lucene 3.0.3 on linux anyway.
As someone has already suggested, run lsof to see which files your
process has open. Maybe you aren't closing the source documents.
--
Ian.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Vo Nhu Tuan wrote:
> I have already used compound file and closed
I have already used compound file and closed everything I can.
Would this line cause problem when called many times?
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(FSDirectory.open(indexFile), new
StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_30), true, IndexWriter.MaxFieldLength.LIMITED);
This FSDirectory.open() is th
and also try using compound files (cfs)
2011/3/23 Vo Nhu Tuan :
> Hi,
>
> Can someone help me with this problem please? I got these when running my
> program:
>
> java.io.FileNotFoundException:
> /Users/vonhutuan/Documents/workspace/InformationExtractor/index_wordlist/_i82.frq
> (Too many open
Hi,
Have a look at this:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Why_am_I_getting_an_IOException_that_says_.22Too_many_open_files.22.3F
m.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Vo Nhu Tuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone help me with this problem please? I got these when running my
> program:
>
use lsof to count the number of opened files
ulimit to modify it. maybe u need ask adminstrator to modify limit.conf
2011/3/23 Vo Nhu Tuan :
> Hi,
>
> Can someone help me with this problem please? I got these when running my
> program:
>
> java.io.FileNotFoundException:
> /Users/vonhutuan/Docume
Hi,
Can someone help me with this problem please? I got these when running my
program:
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/Users/vonhutuan/Documents/workspace/InformationExtractor/index_wordlist/_i82.frq
(Too many open files)
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.open(Native Method)
at java.
ok, yes, I've solved. Thanks for help.
On 23 March 2011 09:15, Anshum wrote:
> So functionally I am assuming you've achieved what you'd been aiming for.
> About the scores, the matchalldocs does score docs based on norm factors
> etc.
> therefore the score wouldn't be 0.
> --
> Anshum Gupta
> ht
So functionally I am assuming you've achieved what you'd been aiming for.
About the scores, the matchalldocs does score docs based on norm factors
etc.
therefore the score wouldn't be 0.
--
Anshum Gupta
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Patrick Diviacco <
patrick.divia.
yeah it is clear. However I don't just want all documents, I still want to
perform my specific query and on the bottom of the relevant docs, to list
all not relevant docs as well. (I need this for successive steps).
However now it seems to work. I've added MatchAllDocsQuery to my
BooleanQuery, and
Hi,
Why do you want to use Lucene trunk? You code is quite simple and does not
use any of the special new features of Lucene trunk, so why no use stable
versions for now?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Mess
argh, yeah exactly.
There is no way to inspect the index without luke ?
Or to use luke with Lucene 4.0 ?
thanks
On 23 March 2011 09:01, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You are using a Lucene version that is not yet released (maybe 3.x branch
> or
> trunk). This seems to be not supported by th
Sorry for spam. I've actually added the following line:
booleanQuery.add(new MatchAllDocsQuery(), BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
and now I get all collection back. So it seems to work...
I'm a bit confused about the score of the not relevant docs:
i.e. the last result is
298736393 107419924 All-te
Hi Patrick,
You *don't* need to add a MatchAllDocs query to anything. If you just want
all docs, just pass it to the searcher.search function and you'd get all
results.
MatchAllDocs query is the same as BooleanQuery , just that MADQ matches all
docs in the index. You wouldn't need to specify anythi
Hi,
You are using a Lucene version that is not yet released (maybe 3.x branch or
trunk). This seems to be not supported by the used Luke version.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick D
Thanks :)
Thankfully we don't delete from the database - just mark items as "inactive"
(actual delete occurs only in a yearly cleanup process).
We can live with inaccurate results, including deleted/inactive items.
Have you used DBSight? Would you mind sharing your opinion - did you like it
better
The issue with
My confusion about MatchAllDocsQuery is that I cannot specify which terms in
which fields to search with it. I'm probably wrong.
I currently have a BooleanQuery, that I use to build the query with several
fields and several terms.
Can I just pass MatchAllDocsQuery to BooleanQuery
ups, I've just used toString as you suggested and this is what I got:
*.*:*.* title:Flickrmeetup_01 description:Michael description:R.
description:Ross tags:rochester tags:ny tags:usa tags:flickrmeetup
tags:king76 tags:eos350d tags:canon50mmf14 tags:mikros tags:canon tags:ef
tags:50mm tags:f14 tag
23 matches
Mail list logo
