you should use a proximity search, so the matching words are near:
q=Itemname:("item movie"~2)
I don't remember if you need also to customize your indexing analyser
so diferent values are far enough for your needs or if that it's
already done.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Sailesh wrote:
>
>
I want no fields to be returned, as they belong to different fields but
their fieldnames are same.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Searching-Multivalued-fileds-tp2233114p2233220.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hi Sailesh,
As per my understanding, (+ITEMNAME:item +ITEMNAME:movie) will search for a
document containing item and movie terms and return the DOC 1.
What you want to get?
-HarshCode
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Sailesh wrote:
>
> My index contains multivalued filed like and i use whi
Hey,
this looks like you are hitting the optimization done in LUCENE-2773
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2773) that prevents
merged segments that are larger than 10% (by default - see
LogMergePolicy#noCFSRatio) of the index size it will be left in
non-compound format even if compoun
