Does it make any sense?
Every time a search result is shown, the original document could have been
changed, no matter how fast the indexing speed is.
If you can accept this inconsistency, you do not need to index so frequently at
all.
-- Original --
From: "s
Does it make any sense?
Every time a search result is shown, the original document could have been
changed, no matter how fast the indexing speed is.
If you can accept this inconsistency, you do not need to index so frequently at
all.
-- Original --
From: "s
> yes, but if they are typing away, they likely aren't also searching at
> the same time unless they have two keyboards and four hands... so why
> update anything in real time?
Presumably the OP meant user-A was editing the doc and other Users ,
or a monitoring app, are searching said doc simulta
Hi Umesh,
I'm not really confident that Zoie or anything built on the current version
of Lucene would be able to handle search as you type kind of a setup.
--
Anshum Gupta
http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Umesh Prasad wrote:
> You can also look at Zoie and see if i
You can also look at Zoie and see if it fits your needs. This is a
contribution by linkedin.
http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/ZOIE/Home
Also look at MemoryIndex .. This is good for creating single document index
and searching on it.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_0_3/api/all/org/apache
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:06 PM, software visualization
wrote:
> The user is sitting there typing away and of course everything is changing
> in real time. This seems to be orthogonal to the idea of a Lucene index
> which is costly to construct and costly to update.
>
yes, but if they are typing
Hi,
An update on each word/character typed is not a practical thing to do for
lucene (as per the current scheme of things). Though there's something
called the Real Time search, which lets you search on an updated document,
though the assumption is that the frequency is not as that of a word type.
I bought some items from a commercial site, because of the unique
channel of purchases,
product prices unexpected, I think you can go to see: elesales.com ,
high-quality products can also attract you.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jav
This has probably been asked before but I couldn't find it, so...
Is it possible / advisable / practical to use Lucene as the basis of a live
document search capability? By "live document" I mean a largish document
such as a word processor might be able to handle which is being edited
currently.
Happy Holidays !
Test case
doc1 : test -- one two three
doc2 : test, one two three
doc3 : one two three
Search query : "one two three" by QueryParser and StandardAnalyzer
Question: why all of three documents have the same score? I really want
the doc3 has higher score becaus
Thanks all of you.
On 28 December 2010 15:54, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I also not that this is a fundamental characteristic of the great
> performance of Lucene and its related products since it allows cleanly
> managed resources. "this" is generally called paging.
>
> paul
>
>
> Le 28 déc. 2010
I also not that this is a fundamental characteristic of the great performance
of Lucene and its related products since it allows cleanly managed resources.
"this" is generally called paging.
paul
Le 28 déc. 2010 à 10:32, Uwe Schindler a écrit :
> The TopDocs returning methods are not intended
The TopDocs returning methods are not intended to get all results, so Max Int
is not a valid value. The maximum hit count allocates a PriorityQueue with so
many slots. To retrieve all hits (unsorted) you have to write your own
collector. But that is not the natural use case for a full text engin
MultiSearcher uses the given integer as the expected number of results
and creates a hitqueue for it. Since you are asking for INT_MAX hits
Lucene creates a hitQueue for either INT_MAX or maxDoc() documents and
preallocates that memory. So in the worst case it creates an Object
array with INTEGER_M
I am using lucene 3.0.3
On 28 December 2010 14:06, Laxmilal Menariya wrote:
> Which version you are trying of lucene ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jawahar Lal wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using multiSearcher as
> >
> > objMultiSearcher.search(query,null,Integer.MaxValue);
> >
> > I
Which version you are trying of lucene ?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Jawahar Lal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using multiSearcher as
>
> objMultiSearcher.search(query,null,Integer.MaxValue);
>
> I searched a query, which should & does not return any hit. As I run the
> query, the above statement
16 matches
Mail list logo
