Allow me to recommend a little trick to track the origin of a class which works
often:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.WhitespaceAnalyzer.class.getResource("WhitespaceAnalyzer.class")
will give you a URL that should be the URL of the jar, followed by an
exclamation mark, followed by the jar-inter
Dear Uwe,
I remove additional jar files and it is working. Thanks a lot for the
guidance.
Regards,
Lahiru
Then it seems that you have a classpath mismatch. Can it be that you are
mixing different Lucene versions (like the unreleased 3.x-Branch).
StandardAnalyzer in 3.0.2 definitely does not use CharacterUtils (and also
not in later versions). WhitespaceTokenizer in 3.x uses it.
So you should review yo
org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> This class is Lucene 3.1+ only, currently not released. What package wants
> to link with it?
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
: It is possible to always have Lucene end up with the
: same set of index filenames for each index generation
: process?
this smells like an XY problem why do you car what the file names
are? that's an implementtaion detail of lucene -- the directory as a whole
is the index -- what are yo
This class is Lucene 3.1+ only, currently not released. What package wants
to link with it?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Lahiru Samarakoon [mailto:lahir...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, D
Hi All,
I am using *lucene-3.0.2* with *spring framework-3.0.5*. Spring context
initialization failed due to a *java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/lucene/util/CharacterUtils*. But that class can not be found in
the jars shipped with *lucene-3.0.2*. I am stumped here. Please advice.
Thank
It is possible to always have Lucene end up with the
same set of index filenames for each index generation
process?
I have an application that creates an index for a
set of files, and generally, the index files created
are the following:
_0.cfs segments_2 segments.gen
However, it appears somet
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
>> wrote:
>>> I think of the Lucene QueryParser like SQL. SQL is text based and also
>>> meant for human entered text - but for either very
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> I think of the Lucene QueryParser like SQL. SQL is text based and also
>> meant for human entered text - but for either very expert users, or
>> programmatically created queries. You n
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> I think of the Lucene QueryParser like SQL. SQL is text based and also
> meant for human entered text - but for either very expert users, or
> programmatically created queries. You normally don't want to pass
> text from a search box directly
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
>>> I was just wondering what the logic was for defaulting to or instead of
>>> and.
>>
>> Largely historical. I think the origina
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > I have googled the mailing list archives and didn't find
> > anything. But if
> > this has been discussed to death, please just point me to
> > the threads in the
> > archive. rather than stirring up some old flame war.
> > Or just tell me
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
>> I was just wondering what the logic was for defaulting to or instead of and.
>
> Largely historical. I think the original rational was that it
> probably fit better with the traditional
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
> I was just wondering what the logic was for defaulting to or instead of and.
Largely historical. I think the original rational was that it
probably fit better with the traditional vector space model.
There's also not a good reason to change t
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
> I just encountered an unexpected behavior in query parser. So, if you pass
> in a query that is multiple terms, like "cat hat", the query that is
> returned uses an or between the two term searches, instead of an and. That
> is, the query will
> I have googled the mailing list archives and didn't find
> anything. But if
> this has been discussed to death, please just point me to
> the threads in the
> archive. rather than stirring up some old flame war.
> Or just tell me what
> to google for (the terms I've tried haven't yielded
> anyt
I just encountered an unexpected behavior in query parser. So, if you pass
in a query that is multiple terms, like "cat hat", the query that is
returned uses an or between the two term searches, instead of an and. That
is, the query will return all documents with the given field containing
either
Here's a great intro to the garbage collection options:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/09/19/java-garbage-collection-boot-camp-draft/
@Ganesh:
The issue with 64 bit isn't really performance, it's that you can't allocate
much of
your memory to the JVM. So by definition your performance w
I've used 30-35gb heaps and it is painful.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 13, 2010, at 2:16 AM, "Danil ŢORIN" wrote:
> GC times on large heaps are pretty painfull right now (haven't tried
> G1 collector, knowledgeable people : please advise)
>
> Also it's very dependent on your index and query patt
GC times on large heaps are pretty painfull right now (haven't tried
G1 collector, knowledgeable people : please advise)
Also it's very dependent on your index and query pattern, so you could
improve it by using some -XX magic.
My recommendation is to scale horizontally (spit index into shards),
21 matches
Mail list logo
