RE: Term browsing much slower in Lucene 3.x.x

2010-07-29 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > My other question is whether there are planned performance : > enhancements to address this loss of performance? : : These APIs are very different in the next major release (4.0) of : Lucene, so except for problems spotted by users like you, there's not : much more dev happening against them

RE: Term browsing much slower in Lucene 3.x.x

2010-07-29 Thread Nader, John P
Thanks much for your response. Yes, our terms are sorted in index-sort order. I think you have a good suggestion, which is to get the term docs once and then seek to each term. I will try that approach and report back to the forum on the results. Like you I am surprised by the overhead of th

Re: Possible inconsistency in NearSpansOrdered and NearSpansUnordered

2010-07-29 Thread Michael McCandless
Sounds like an unwanted inconsistency to me! Can you open an issue, post a patch? Thanks, Mike On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Santiago M. Mola wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to implement a query for phrases without strict ordered and > with missing words. At the moment, I'm trying the Spans infr

Re: java.io.IOException: background merge hit exception: Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: _1vw.fdt

2010-07-29 Thread Michael McCandless
BTW if you have the CheckIndex output when you ran it on the two failed indices, can you forward that? Mike On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:08 AM, David Sitsky wrote: >> Incidentally.. this is what TerminateProcess does say from MSDN: >> >>

Re: java.io.IOException: background merge hit exception: Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: _1vw.fdt

2010-07-29 Thread Michael McCandless
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:08 AM, David Sitsky wrote: > Incidentally.. this is what TerminateProcess does say from MSDN: > > TerminateProcess initiates termination and returns immediately. This > stops execution of all threads within the process and requests > cancellation of all pending I/O. The t

Re: Term browsing much slower in Lucene 3.x.x

2010-07-29 Thread Michael McCandless
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Nader, John P wrote: > We recently upgraded from lucene 2.4.0 to lucene 3.0.2.  Our load testing > revealed a serious performance drop specific to traversing the list of terms > and their associated documents for a given indexed field.  Our code looks > somethin

Possible inconsistency in NearSpansOrdered and NearSpansUnordered

2010-07-29 Thread Santiago M. Mola
Hi, I'm trying to implement a query for phrases without strict ordered and with missing words. At the moment, I'm trying the Spans infrastructure and this problem just arised. NearSpansOrdered's constructor will throw an IllegalArgumentException if less than 2 clauses are given, while NearSpansOr