Depends for which query no? ;)
Sounds like you want to simulate the QP behavior
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/queryparsersyntax.html for
boosting. Meaning, if for the query "b" you want to simulate the query
"b OR b$^2" and have matches of b$ count more than b, then I'd follow
how QP does it
Hi,
I never this kind of build before, but just from the error message
I guess it could mean two variables:
${project.artifactId}
${project.version}
are not defined (otherwise exact jar file name would be printed out)?
Could it be some environment setup issue?
Best regards, Lisheng
-Origi
Hi,
I'm trying to run ant task "generate-maven-artifacts" in lucene-solr
build.xml file.
But getting this error:
/home/chardex/lucene/dev/lucene/common-build.xml:312: Error deploying
artifact 'org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar': Error deploying artifact: File
/home/chardex/lucene/dev/lucene/build/$
Hi all,
Consider the following string: "the buffalo buffaloes" [1].
When passed through a stemming analyzer, the resulting token would be
"buffalo buffalo" (assuming a good stemmer).
To enable exact searches, say I mark the original term and index it at
the same term position. So "the buf
Lucene 2454 includes an example of matching logic that respects the structure
in XML documents (see (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2454 )
The example class TestNestedDocumentQuery queries xhtml marked up with hResume
syntax.
We don't have XQuery syntax support in a parser now (an
you just have to write a parser that parse each sections of the XML document.
and these documents will be indexed as a separate informational units . then
the
lucene ranking algorithm can over these separate sections.
i can give the codes doing this thing
henok
good day to you
- Origina
Hi
If you google "Lucene xml" you'll find info, but I'll attempt to
answer your questions below
> ...
> I wonder whether Lucene:
>
> (1) provides full-text search over content of XML elements ?
Yes. If you index the content, lucene will let you search over it.
> (2) provides substring search
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 20:53 +0200, Christopher Condit wrote:
[Toke: 140GB single segment is huge]
> Sorry - I wasn't clear here. The total index size ends up being 140GB
> but to try to help improve performance we build 50 separate indexes
> (which end up being a bit under 3gb each) and then ope
