I want to cache full text into memory to improve performance.
Full text is only used to highlight in my application(But it's very
time consuming, My avg query time is about 250ms, I guess it will cost
about 50ms if I just get top 10 full text. Things get worse when get
more full text because i
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Max Lynch wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to continuously iterate over the documents in my lucene index
> as the index is updated. Kind of like a "stream" of documents. Is there a
> way I can achieve this?
>
> Would something like this be sufficient (untested):
>
>
Hello,
I am trying to create a suggest search (search results are displayed while the
user is entering the query) for names, but the search should also give results
if the given name just sounds like an indexed name. However a perfect match
should be ranked higher than a similar sounding matc
Le 13-juil.-10 à 23:49, Christopher Condit a écrit :
* are there performance optimizations that I haven't thought of?
The first and most important one I'd think of is get rid of NFS.
You can happily do a local copy which might, even for 10 Gb take less
than 30 seconds at server start.
pa
We're getting up there in terms of corpus size for our Lucene indexing
application:
* 20 million documents
* all fields need to be stored
* 10 short fields / document
* 1 long free text field / document (analyzed with a custom shingle-based
analyzer)
* 140GB total index size
* Optimized into a s
Hi,
I would like to continuously iterate over the documents in my lucene index
as the index is updated. Kind of like a "stream" of documents. Is there a
way I can achieve this?
Would something like this be sufficient (untested):
int currentDocId = 0;
while(true) {
for(; currentDocId < r
Yep, that's pretty much it..
Erick
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:47 AM, manjula wijewickrema
wrote:
> Ok Erick, answer is there. If there is no any document exceeds the default
> maxfieldlength, then no any document will be truncated although we increase
> the no. of documents in the index. A'm I c
Hi Ethan,
You'll probably get better answers about Solr specific stuff on the
solr-u...@a.l.o list.
Check out PositionFilterFactory - it may address your issue:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PositionFilterFactory
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Et
I am using lucene 2.9.3 (via Solr 1.4.1) on windows and am trying to
understand ShingleFilter. I wrote the following code and find that if
I provide more words than the actual phrase indexed in the field, then
the search on that field fails (no score found with debugQuery=true).
Here is an example
