I want to use fast highlighter in solr1.4 and find a issue in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268
File Name Date Attached ↑
Attached By Size
SOLR-1268.patch 2010-02-05 10:32 PM
Koji Sekiguc
Hi,
Has anyone done a performance comparison for an index on a Solid State Drive
(vs any other hard drive ... SATA/SCSI)?
Thanks, Rob.
> > Yes bauer~0.8 bauer as query will bring you both exact
> and fuzzy matches.
>
> Is this the normal way to do it?
Somehow. 'bauer~0.8 OR bauer' is easiest way to fuzzy search which also finds
exact matches.
> Unfortunately this parser seems to be missing in 3.0.1
http://lucene.apache.org/
Am 12.06.2010 13:57, schrieb Ahmet Arslan:
I am using lucene 3.0.1. I use a MultiFieldQueryParser with
a GermanAnalyzer. In my index are some values among others
one document with the title "bauer". I append to every word
in my query a ~0.8 (here I am not sure if this is the way to
do it). If I
> I am using lucene 3.0.1. I use a MultiFieldQueryParser with
> a GermanAnalyzer. In my index are some values among others
> one document with the title "bauer". I append to every word
> in my query a ~0.8 (here I am not sure if this is the way to
> do it). If I try to search now, I will not get th
hi all
when use highlighter, We must provide a tokenStream and the
original text. To get a tokenStream, we can either reanlyze the
original text or use saved TermVector to reconstruct it.
In my application, highlight will cost average 200ms-300ms, and I
want to optimze it to lower than 100ms.
