Re: Right memory for search application

Great explanation Erick. Thanks. I'll try that. On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Quick reply to question (4). Not quite right, you're not gaining anything, > you still have a yymmddHHMMSS field that will consume all the memory > when you sort by it. > > Remember that the c

Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

Hi Adriano, Ahhh !!! Good point...Thanks a ton for the quick response. Kannan From: Adriano Crestani To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wed, April 28, 2010 7:31:20 PM Subject: Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene

Re: how to design Lucene Document and Field to indexing and searching email message and attachments

Erick: Thanks for your information. I search for the similar question and get a very like issue:Best Practice: emails and file-attachments on 15 August 2006,in mailing list archives(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200608.mbox/browser),but there is no final a

Re: Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

Hi Kannan, contrib-queryparser code is not compatible with 2.4 release because it uses the Attribute API, which was only introduced in 2.9. Regards, Adriano Crestani On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:44 PM, kannan chandrasekaran wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a question regarding the new Lucene query pars

Re: how to design Lucene Document and Field to indexing and searching email message and attachments

Hoss: Thanks for your answer,but what means for References: ? I make a mistake to reply other thread's message,I realize it when I visit mailing list archives through web, this is my first time to use mail list,and I'll take care of this in future. dazhi - Original Me

Is the new Lucene Query parser framework compatibility with older lucene versions ?

Hi All, I have a question regarding the new Lucene query parser framework in the contribs project. My company's project is running on top of 2.4.0 release of Lucene. I am trying to evaluate the new query parser framework that was added to the contribs project in the Lucene 2.9.0 release an

Re: how to design Lucene Document and Field to indexing and searching email message and attachments

: References: : : : <2e6a89a648463a4ebf093a9062c16683018293ddf...@sbmailbox1.sb.statsbibliotek : et.dk> : : Subject: how to design Lucene Document and Field to indexing and searching : email message and attachments http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Threa

Re: Call for Participation: Technical Talks -- ApacheCon North America 2010

On Apr 28, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Sally Khudairi >> Date: April 28, 2010 1:48:57 PM EDT >> To: annou...@apachecon.com >> Subject: Call for Participation: Technical Talks -- ApacheCon North America >> 2010 >> Reply-To: s...@apache.or

Fwd: Call for Participation: Technical Talks -- ApacheCon North America 2010

Begin forwarded message: > From: Sally Khudairi > Date: April 28, 2010 1:48:57 PM EDT > To: annou...@apachecon.com > Subject: Call for Participation: Technical Talks -- ApacheCon North America > 2010 > Reply-To: s...@apache.org > > ApacheCon North America 2010 > 1-5 November 2010 -- Westin Pe

Re: how to design Lucene Document and Field to indexing and searching email message and attachments

This problem has been discussed several times, although I can't remember the answer. So I'd recommend searching the mail archive first. Lucid maintains a searchable archive, see: http://www.lucidimagination.com/About-Search HTH Erick On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:35 AM, 刘庆志 wrote: > hi all: > our

Re: Right memory for search application

Quick reply to question (4). Not quite right, you're not gaining anything, you still have a yymmddHHMMSS field that will consume all the memory when you sort by it. Remember that the controlling part here is the number of unique values. So think about two fields, yymmdd and HHMMSS. Use the HHMMSS