Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone is using SOLR successfully in Australia in a
high end high transaction system?
Cheers
Andrew
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ja
Hi all.
I notice that Filter.getDocIdSet() is now documented as follows:
Note: This method will be called once per segment in
the index during searching. The returned {...@link DocIdSet}
must refer to document IDs for that segment, not for
the top-level reader.
If I look at Luce
Forwarding to lucene only - the big cross-post caused my gmail filters
to "file" it.
-Yonik
-- Forwarded message --
From: Grant Ingersoll
Date: Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:03 PM
Subject: Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation: Prague, Czech
Republic May 20 & 21, 2010
To: Lucene m
Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation - Prague, Czech Republic May 20 &
21, 2010
All submissions must be received by Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 12 Midnight CET/6
PM US EDT
The first European conference dedicated to Lucene and Solr is coming to Prague
from May 18-21, 2010. Apache Lucene E
Greetings,
Don't forget that the Hadoop/Scalability/NoSQL meetup is next
Wednesday, March 31st at 6:45pm! We're going to have a very exciting
guest: Jake Mannix from LinkedIn will talk about machine learning on
Hadoop. He's a well-decorated engineer across many disciplines, and
even knows quite a
Is this during indexing or searching?
Mike
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Siraj Haider wrote:
>
>> We upgraded to 2.9.2 from 2.3.2 and the garbage collection performance
>> deteriorated drastically. The system is going to Full GC cycles
It was an unexpected coincidence that the two cases ended up with the
same field name. I just changed the one case to index with a different
field name and that fixed my problem. I was still curious though.
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: java-user-return-45558-paul.b.murdoch=s
I don't think so, but a quick way to check would be to look at your
index with a copy of Luke and see what the actual tokens are.
But I'm not sure it matters, I don't think you *can* make things work
out well; your query-time analysis will be...er...difficult. You only
get to specify one analyzer
On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Siraj Haider wrote:
> We upgraded to 2.9.2 from 2.3.2 and the garbage collection performance
> deteriorated drastically. The system is going to Full GC cycles with long
> pauses very frequently. Did something got changed that we need to account
> for?
Yes, quite
Hello there,
I am getting exception when running queries with new getDocIdSet() in my
customer filter. Following is the code for my getDocIdSet() function:
/public DocIdSet getDocIdSet(IndexReader reader) throws IOException {
OpenBitSet bitSet = new OpenBitSet(reader.maxDoc());
for (in
Hi,
I have a quick question. If I have an index where some text values are
indexed under the same field name, but some are ANALYZED and some are
NOT_ANALYZED, does the last value's flags change the flags for the whole
field name? For instance if I index 3 sentences under a field name as
ANALYZ
We upgraded to 2.9.2 from 2.3.2 and the garbage collection performance
deteriorated drastically. The system is going to Full GC cycles with
long pauses very frequently. Did something got changed that we need to
account for?
thanks in advance
-siraj
--
On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Shashi Kant wrote:
> Add the common terms such as "University", "School", "Medicine",
> "Institute" etc. to stopwords list, so you are left with Stanford,
> "Palo Alto" etc.
I don't know if I would remove them, but you might consider using the
CommonGram or n-gram a
Add the common terms such as "University", "School", "Medicine",
"Institute" etc. to stopwords list, so you are left with Stanford,
"Palo Alto" etc.
Then use Ahmet's suggestion of using a booleanquery
.setMinimumNumberShouldMatch() to (say) 75% of the query string
length.
Finally, if you wish to
14 matches
Mail list logo
