Yes, the fastest to get *all* documents, as it simply iterates over global
TermDocs(null) without intersecting with a filter.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michel Nadeau [mailto:aka...@
I think I solved my problem - used MatchAllDocsQuery() - is that the best
solution ?
- Mike
aka...@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Michel Nadeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use ConstantScoreQuery to find all documents in an index like this:
>
> td = searcher.search(new ConstantScoreQuery(clu
Hi,
I use ConstantScoreQuery to find all documents in an index like this:
td = searcher.search(new ConstantScoreQuery(cluCF), null, md, cluSort);
* cluCF is a Filter
* md is int = 999
* cluSort is a Sort
My problem is that I don't always have a filter (cluCF) - so sometimes its
value is 'null'
Thanks Ian and Andrzej.
You solved a mystery for us.
-- Yuval
From: Andrzej Bialecki [...@getopt.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:53 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do deleted documents affect scores?
On 2010-02-11 17:35, Ian Lea wr
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:30:14AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Oh you're saying we don't know if the underlying enum actually skipped vs
> just scanned?
Yep.
> Isn't the skip data also based on deltas?
Yes, but that's internal to the skip reader, in both Lucene and Lucy/KS. When
it com
On 2010-02-11 17:35, Ian Lea wrote:
I'm pretty sure that the answer is no and a quick test on a small
index with/without deleted docs showed no difference in the scores,
using 3.0. But that was hardly a rigorous test and I don't know
enough about lucene internals and scoring to give a definitive
I'm pretty sure that the answer is no and a quick test on a small
index with/without deleted docs showed no difference in the scores,
using 3.0. But that was hardly a rigorous test and I don't know
enough about lucene internals and scoring to give a definitive answer.
Shouldn't be too hard for yo
Hi Chris,
its only possible with TermRangeQuery/NumericRangeQuery (depending on data
type, corresponding filters can also be used) with both ends null. E.g., Solr
does it that way.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -O
Hello,
is there a way query syntax fo rretrieving fields which have a value?
Something like myfield:NOT EMPTY. I searched the lucene docu, but didn´t
found anything for this issue.
Thanks in advance.
chris
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Retrieve-fields-that-are-not-emp
Thank you, Robert.
--- On Wed, 2/10/10, Robert Muir wrote:
> From: Robert Muir
> Subject: Re: TREC Data and Topic-Specific Index
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 9:23 AM
> Hi, so you mean around 15% and 24%
> respectively? i think you could fairly
> say ei
Hello All,
I am writing some test cases for a custom-class which
modifies incoming TermQuery and adds some other Terms and returns a
BooleanQuery. As always I have used assertEquals(), which apparently
uses equals() method. I found out that following two queries are
different from each
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:33:27PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> In Lucene, skipping is done through the aggregator,
>
> I had a look at MultiDocsEnum in the flex blanch. It doesn't know when
> sub-enum is reading skip data.
I'm c
12 matches
Mail list logo
