Merry Christmas to you, Weiwei.
If you want to release your software under *exactly* the Apache License
(version 2.0 is the most current form of it), you may do so very easily -
just read the appendix at the end of this page:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
In particular, note that
> This (very large number of unique terms) is a problem for Lucene currently.
>
> There are some simple improvements we could make to the terms dict
> format to not require so much RAM per term in the terms index...
> LUCENE-1458 (flexible indexing) has these improvements, but
> unfortunately tied
To you as well, Weiwei Wang.
You can theoretically release your project under a license that is very similar
to the Apache license at any time, presuming you are licensing rights related
to your project. To create a project that is maintained by the Apache Software
Foundation, you should proba
First, if you don't need to distinguish between posts and comments,
you don't care about the increment gap. But if you do...
It's kind of arcane, but here's the general idea. You override your Analyzer
of choice and implement getPositionIncrementGap. Say your
getPositionIncrementGap
returns 100. W
Thanks!
-
Mário André
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Sergipe - IFS
Mestrando em MCC - Universidade Federal de Alagoas - UFAL
http://www.marioandre.com.br/
Skype: mario-fa
---
Ignore the previous message, I realized that I just needed to choose the
right combination to get a result!
Thanks again for your time and patience.
Take care.
Sincerely;
Fayyaz
syedfa wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for your kind reply, and for pointing out my mistake. I
> made the correction,
Thanks very much for your kind reply, and for pointing out my mistake. I
made the correction, (I can't believe I left that line out!) This was a
total oversight on my part. Having said that, after making the change, I
re-ran the application, but now I'm getting no results to appear. I've
tried
Hi mario,
PlainTextDictionary expects a text file with one word per line like:
hello
world
foo
bar
simon
2009/12/23 Mário André :
> Hello friends,
>
> I’m new here and in the lucene Project. I’m trying use the "spellchecker"
> according to the exemple below:
>
>
>
> // To index a file containin
Hello friends,
Im new here and in the lucene Project. Im trying use the "spellchecker"
according to the exemple below:
// To index a file containing words:
spellchecker.indexDictionary(new PlainTextDictionary(new
File("myfile.txt")));
String[] suggestions = spellchecker.suggestSimilar(
@Erick, you are right i will have to stop thinking in terms of databases,
thats why i wanted to discuss this.
i don't get how can i use getPositionIncrementGap, could you provide little
more details.
thanks,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Ya just gotta stop thinking li
Ya just gotta stop thinking like a database guy, man . Lucene searches
lots and lots of text very well. It doesn't do joins worth a darn. The
moment
you star thinking in terms of sub-queries, you're probably starting down the
wrong track.
Here's a possibility. Index each post and all associated co
The size of your index isn't a very useful number without knowing a
significant amount about the structure of your index. Depending upon what's
stored, what's indexed and what kind of searching you're doing (e.g.
sorting?) it varies. About all we can say is that you'll probably need less
than 100G.
You behaviour sounds really like a GC issue. I would switch the GC to
verbose and see what's happening (like Mark in his blog post).
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Siraj Haider [mailto:s
Are you using IndexReader.reopen to open a new reader, from an
existing one? That's much more efficient than opening a new reader.
I think a good next step is to run with IndexWriter.setInfoStream on,
and run your JRE with verbose GC, to see more details.
Mike
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:12 AM, S
We have dual cpu intel xeon machines running "Red Hat Enterprise Linux
ES release 3 (Taroon Update 6)". We have 4GB memory on these machines
with 2GB allocated to tomcat.
After modifying the index we open a new one, warm it up, make it live
and then close the old one.
-siraj
Michael McCandle
Hi Shahid,
This is just one of the ways to get it.
You can have an id to your post and comment for every post get's an
subID so for example
Post 1 get id 2566 and comment 1 in that post get id 2566-64. You can
use various methods to get this ID. Then you can write your own Hit
Collector in whic
Hi,
Following are details of my problem and possible solutions which I can think
of. Please suggest which should I choose, or is there any other approach
better than these.
I want to index blog posts and their comments, in my database posts and
comments are stored in two different tables. Current
Hi
24Gb RAM for a 100Gb index is likely to be plenty. You don't have a
huge amount of control over what lucene loads in memory, but take a
look at termInfosIndexDivisor in IndexReader. And I believe that
omitting field norms (Field.setOmitNorms) may help too. Googling for
"lucene memory usage"
Hi Fayyaz,
>>I have found an error in the web.xml file,
Good job! I found an error in your code so that makes us even :)
It looks like you removed the line in the "openExampleIndex" method which opens
the searcher.
That explains your null pointer.
The problem you found in the web.xml isn't a
19 matches
Mail list logo
