Hi, dudes,
I finished an search suggestion module a few months ago.
The framework is as below:
1. Log all your search keywords or retrieve all your segmented terms which
can be searched
2. Index all the keywords and or terms with N-Gram tech
3. Search this index with a same analyzer based on user
Hi,
Have a look at http://www.sematext.com/products/autocomplete/index.html
It handles Chinese and large volumes of data.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: fulin tang
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, November
Hello,
For those living in or near NYC, you may be interested in joining (and/or
presenting?) at the NYC Search & Discovery Meetup.
Topics are: search, machine learning, data mining, NLP, information gathering,
information extraction, etc.
http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Search-and-Discovery/
Our
> Hi Ahmet,
>
> After thinking about what Shai brought up, I changed my
> mind and think it is
> not good enough that we only have Collation as a way to
> solve this.
> Because you might want turkish stemming too, and right now
> there is no way
> for the included snowball turkish stemmer to work.
Hi Ahmet,
After thinking about what Shai brought up, I changed my mind and think it is
not good enough that we only have Collation as a way to solve this.
Because you might want turkish stemming too, and right now there is no way
for the included snowball turkish stemmer to work.
I really do not l
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:51:34 Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Stefan Trcek
wrote:
> > I'd do, but was not successful to get the svn repo some months ago.
> > I have to claim the sys admin for any svn repo to open a door
> > through the firewall. Gave up due to
> >
> >
OK I committed this, plus further removes of "expert" from TopDocs, to
trunk (future 3.1), 2.9 and 3.0 branches.
Thanks!
Mike
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Stefan Trcek wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 11:07:41 Michael McCandless wrote:
>> OK -- none of IndexSearcher's search methods need
Super, thanks. I'll commit your patch, fixing javadocs for
TopDocs/TopFieldDocs.
Mike
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Stefan Trcek wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 11:07:41 Michael McCandless wrote:
>> OK -- none of IndexSearcher's search methods needed tweaking? Just
>> TopDocs/TopFieldDo
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 11:07:41 Michael McCandless wrote:
> OK -- none of IndexSearcher's search methods needed tweaking? Just
> TopDocs/TopFieldDocs?
Yes, you can use these methods in Searcher, they are sufficient:
TopDocs Searcher.search(Query query, Filter filter, int n)
TopFieldDocs Sea
OK -- none of IndexSearcher's search methods needed tweaking? Just
TopDocs/TopFieldDocs?
Mike
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Trcek wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2009 18:42:50 Michael McCandless wrote:
>> I was able to apply that git patch just fine -- so I think it'll
>> work?
>
> Good
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:42:50 Michael McCandless wrote:
> I was able to apply that git patch just fine -- so I think it'll
> work?
Good to hear it works that simple.
This patch completes the task.
It is a "two file" patch, so if this will work too, I'm confident.
Stefan
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2
11 matches
Mail list logo
