New Technical White Papers on Apache Lucene 2.9 and Solr 1.4 from Lucid Imagination

2009-10-23 Thread Tom Alt
Hi - FYI, Lucid's just put out a two white papers, one on Apache Lucene 2.9 and one on Apache Solr 1.4: - "What's New in Lucene 2.9" covers range of performance improvements and new features (per segment indexing, trierange numeric analysis, and more), along with recommendations for upgrading your

Re: Maximum index file size

2009-10-23 Thread Felipe Lobo
Hi, interesting discussion. Supose my index now has 1 TB. I splitted into 16 hds (65GB per hd) in the same machine with 16 cores. Use parallelmultisearch it's a good idea for this structure?? Results wil be fast?? Is there a better solution for this structure? thanks, On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:33

Re: Handling + as a special character in Lucene search

2009-10-23 Thread mitu2009
Code details: When I execute this line,I get a blank search query. queryField = multiFieldQueryParser.Parse(inpKeywords);keywordsQuery.Add(queryField, BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);And here is my custom analyzer: public class CustomAnalyzer : Analyzer{private static readonly Whitespace

RE: Lucene 1.4.3 "Already closed" IOException

2009-10-23 Thread Zhang, Lisheng
Hi Michael and Ian, Thanks very much for helps, I will investigate and test more. Best regards, Lisheng -Original Message- From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 3:13 AM To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene 1.4.3 "Alre

Re: help needed improving lucene concurret search performance

2009-10-23 Thread Yonik Seeley
How many processors do you have on this system? If you are CPU bound, 100 threads is going to be 10 times slower (at a minimum) than 10 threads (unless you have more than 10 CPUs). -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Wilson Wu wrote: > Dear Friend, >     I hav

Re: Maximum index file size

2009-10-23 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:49 +0200, Jake Mannix wrote: > One of the big problems you'll run into with this index size is that > you'll never have enough RAM to give your OS's IO cache enough room to keep > much of this index in memory, so you're going to be seeking in this monster > file a lot. [.

Re: [ANN] Luke 0.9.9 release

2009-10-23 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Paul Libbrecht wrote: Because I like to have Luke always sitting at hand, I have packed this release as a MacOSX disk-image and applcation. http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/Luke-0.9.9.dmg The icon could be better (I need a hires of Lucene's icon, haven't found it yet). Potentially the

Re: [ANN] Luke 0.9.9 release

2009-10-23 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Because I like to have Luke always sitting at hand, I have packed this release as a MacOSX disk-image and applcation. http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/Luke-0.9.9.dmg The icon could be better (I need a hires of Lucene's icon, haven't found it yet). Potentially the packaging should