: With the new Lucene 2.9.0 (on a newly built index of approx. 30
: million documents) running BooleanQueries containing PhraseQuery does
: not work properly. I've verified this on both optimized and
: unoptimized index versions.
I suspect that this is the same problem as identified in LUCENE-197
Hello,
With the new Lucene 2.9.0 (on a newly built index of approx. 30
million documents) running BooleanQueries containing PhraseQuery does
not work properly. I've verified this on both optimized and
unoptimized index versions.
For example:
lucli> count field1:"john doe"
Searching for: field1:"
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Ganesh wrote:
> In case of 2.4.1, the reader after reopen, will be warmed before actual use.
You mean you must warm it after you call reopen, before using it, right?
> In 2.9, public void setMergedSegmentWarmer(IndexWriter.IndexReaderWarmer
> warmer), does warm
OK I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976.
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I agree isCurrent doesn't work right for an NRT reader. Right now, it
> will always return "true" because it's sharing the segmentInfos in use
> by the writer.
>
> Si
I agree isCurrent doesn't work right for an NRT reader. Right now, it
will always return "true" because it's sharing the segmentInfos in use
by the writer.
Similarly, getVersion will lie.
I'll open an issue to track how to fix it.
Mike
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> Go
Hello all,
In case of 2.4.1, the reader after reopen, will be warmed before actual use. In
2.9, public void setMergedSegmentWarmer(IndexWriter.IndexReaderWarmer warmer),
does warming when we do getReader().
If we do getReader() for every request then whether it will reduce the search
performa
Ok, I will have a shot at the ascending docId order.
Chris
2009/10/13 Paul Elschot
> On Monday 12 October 2009 23:29:07 Christoph Boosz wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thanks for your suggestion. I will test it within the next few days.
> > However, due to memory limitations, it will only work if t
On Monday 12 October 2009 23:29:07 Christoph Boosz wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. I will test it within the next few days.
> However, due to memory limitations, it will only work if the number of hits
> is small enough, am I right?
One can load a single term vector at a time, s
