RE: JVM bug?

I am so happy to always use Java 1.5 :-) It never crashed for us! I think I will not jump to 1.6 the next time. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Jason Rutherglen [mailto:jason.rutherg..

Re: JVM bug?

That looks like it! I am going to upgrade the JVM to 1.6.0_16 however it's not clear from the issue this will fix the problem? On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Could be this issue in Lucene > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342 ? > > -- > - Mark > > http://www.lu

Re: JVM bug?

Could be this issue in Lucene https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342 ? -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Jason Rutherglen wrote: > While indexing with the latest nightly build of Solr on Amazon EC2 the > following JVM bug has occurred twice on two different servers. > > Pos

JVM bug?

While indexing with the latest nightly build of Solr on Amazon EC2 the following JVM bug has occurred twice on two different servers. Post the log to a Jira issue? java version "1.6.0_07" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_07-b06) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 10.0-b23, mixed

Re: Purpose of the file modification date methods in Directory?

Right, and those methods (IndexReader.lastModified and IndexCommit.lastModified) aren't used at all. I guess what I meant to say originally was I had 'found no functional dependencies' on those methods on Directory. Thanks for the data point. - Chas Michael McCandless-2 wrote: > > IndexReade

Re: Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing

Mark Miller wrote: > > Download release candidate 1 here: > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9rc2/ > In case anyone catches - yes that is a cut and paste typo - should read release candidate 2 (obvious, but just to cross my t's). -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.co

Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lucene users, On behalf of the Lucene dev community (a growing community far larger than just the committers) I would like to announce the second release candidate for Lucene 2.9. Please download and check it out – take it for a spin and kick t

Re: How to give a score for all documents?

Any ideia? Or is it a limitation of the Lucene? 2009/8/25 Fabrício Raphael > First, that a document is relevant to a query does not necessarily mean > that this document has to contain some query term. You can have other ways > to assert that a document is relevant to a query. > > My IR model is

Re: Purpose of the file modification date methods in Directory?

IndexReader.lastModified returns lastModified of the latest segments_N file. Also, IndexCommit exposes a lastModified which is the lastModified of the segments_N file for that commit point. Otherwise I don't think Lucene uses it elsewhere. Mike On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:19 PM, cemerick wrote:

Re: Purpose of the file modification date methods in Directory?

I just thought I'd ping the list once more on this question. Any thoughts? If not, I'll leave well enough alone until something breaks... :-) Thanks much, - Chas cemerick wrote: > > I've built a Lucene Directory implementation for jdbm, an embedded Java > database. Part of the Directory API

RE: New "Stream closed" exception with Java 6

Hi Grant Please see attached. Thanks, - Chris - Original Message - From: Grant Ingersoll Sent: Fri, 28/8/2009 1:26pm To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: New "Stream closed" exception with Java 6 Are there any log messages around that spot? Did something happen to the unde

Re: Lucene 2.9 RC1 now available for testing

The dist build issues have been addressed and RC2 will include the missing analyzer and db contrib binaries. Unfortunately, people.apache.org is not up at the moment (https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_org_downtime_initial_report), but I will put up Lucene 2.9 RC2 when it comes back up.

Re: Lucene 2.9 RC1 now available for testing

Apologies - you are correct - contrib/analyzers is in src but not the jar distrib. I will address whatever is up with the build process and put up another RC when apache servers are back up. Thanks for pointing this out, - Mark Bogdan Ghidireac wrote: > Thank you, Lucene 2.9 is a great release..

Re: New "Stream closed" exception with Java 6

Are there any log messages around that spot? Did something happen to the underlying Reader you are using? Can you share that little bit of indexing code? On Aug 27, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Chris Bamford wrote: Hi, Since moving our app to Java 6 and Tomcat 6, we have started getting occasion

Performance diffs between filter.bits() and searcher.docFreq()

Hi all I have following pieces of code (simplified for the simplicity sake): 1: new TermsFilter( termsList:[ new Term( 'id', '111' ) ] ).bits( indexReader ).cardinality() 2: indexReader.docFreq( new Term( 'id', '111' ) ) The problem with the second one are the 'delayed' deletes, so it doesn't

Re: Lucene 2.9 RC1 now available for testing

Thank you, Lucene 2.9 is a great release... I have one issue so far - I cannot find the contrib/analyzers jars, only the sources are present. Bogdan On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello Lucene users, > > On behalf of the

RE: Merge Exception in Lucene 2.4

Hi Since merging is done in separate threads, I am actually firing multiple merges concurrently. That may be causing the problem. Is it possible to make merges a synchronous operation? Sumanta -Original Message- From: Sumanta Bhowmik [mailto:sumanta.bhow...@guavus.com] Sent: Friday, Au