Hi
I ran a long running test and now got this exception.
Exception in thread "Lucene Merge Thread #39"
org.apache.lucene.index.MergePolicy$MergeException: java.io.IOException:
read past EOF
at
org.apache.lucene.index.ConcurrentMergeScheduler.handleMergeException(Concur
rentMergeScheduler.
Thanks a lot for the response !
I wanted to avoid two things:
* Writing the logic that invokes cache-refresh upon IndexReader reload.
* Write my own TopFieldCollector which uses this cache.
I guess I don't have any other choice by to write both of them, or try to
make TFC more "customizable" such
I've pinged Manning to get this corrected. Thanks for the heads-up.
Erik
On Aug 26, 2009, at 5:58 PM, tsuraan wrote:
In the free first chapter of the new Lucene in Action book, it states
that it's targetting Lucene 3.0, but on the Manning page for the book,
it says the code in the boo
Hello,
My apologies, but there was a mix-up reserving our meeting location,
and we don't have access to it.
I'm very sorry, and beer is on me next month. Promise :)
Sent from my Internets
On Aug 25, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Bradford Stephens > wrote:
Hey there,
Apologies for this not going out
Thanks for spotting that! We'll work with Manning to get it fixed...
Yes, we're targeting 3.0 not 2.3 :)
Mike
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:58 PM, tsuraan wrote:
> In the free first chapter of the new Lucene in Action book, it states
> that it's targetting Lucene 3.0, but on the Manning page for th
Daniel,
You may want to look at SOLR-1375 which enables ID checking
using a BloomFilter (with a specified errorrate of false
positives). Otherwise for what you're trying to do, you'd need
to create a hash map?
-J
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Daniel Shane wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm currently ru
In the free first chapter of the new Lucene in Action book, it states
that it's targetting Lucene 3.0, but on the Manning page for the book,
it says the code in the book is written for 2.3. I'm guessing that
the book is the authority on what the book covers, but could somebody
maybe change the Man
Hi all,
I am giving a free talk/ workshop next week on how to analyze and
improve Lucene search performance for native lucene apps. If you've ever
been challenged to get your Java Lucene search apps running faster, I
think you might find the talk of interest.
Free online workshop:
Thursday,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Shane wrote:
> Humm... there is something I dont catch..
>
> When you open up an index writer, you batch up add and deletes. Now if you
> create a signature for the document, as long as you add it works, but what
> happens if you delete stuff from the index
Can you help me? How to give customized scores for all documents?
2009/8/25 FabrÃcio Raphael
> I am continuing a work about wavelets in IR. In the bellow article you will
> to find a example.
>
>
> http://www.ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/srchabstract.jsp?arnumber=4740460&isnumber=4740405&punumber=
Humm... there is something I dont catch..
When you open up an index writer, you batch up add and deletes. Now if
you create a signature for the document, as long as you add it works,
but what happens if you delete stuff from the index using a query as
well as adding?
Does Solr also remember
Looks like we are going to pull back a day and start the freeze sometime
tomorrow (Thursday, August 27 2009). There is still a lot of
documentation to catch up - wouldn't make sense to have anyone look over
what we know is still wrong.
Thanks,
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Mark M
I've done some work and would like to post it to the list in order to get
some opinions and try to reach something that is satisfactory for everyone.
One problem is that i'm actually using Lucene.Net and have written the code
in c#.
Anothe problem is that I'm using version 2.3.2 which might be a b
This is not normal. As long as you are certain you close every
IndexReader/Searcher that you opened, the number of file descriptors
should stay "contained".
Though: how many files are there in your index directory?
Mike
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Chris Bamford wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I won
That's strange ... how do you execute your searches - each search opens up
an IndexReader? Do you make sure to close them? Maybe those are file
descriptors of files you index?
Forgive the silly questions, but I've never seen Lucene run into
out-of-files handles ...
Shai
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4
Hi there,
I wonder if someone can help? We have a successful Lucene app deployed on
Tomcat which works well. As far as we can tell, our developers have observed
all the guidelines in the Lucene FAQ, but on some of our installations, Tomcat
eventually runs out of file descriptors and needs a r
Hi,
The first answer by Sven is more efficient and generaly used.
Abhay
@Sven
f you add the synonyms at query time you can assign a boost factor to
the added synonyms that would boost the matches to a particular term
down. -> something in the interval [0,1]
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Simon
Hi Sven,
While I have no idea bout the example in LiA I can give you some
quick pointers.
if you add the synonyms at query time you can assign a boost factor to
the added synonyms that would boost the matches to a particular term
down. -> something in the interval [0,1]
if you add the synonyms at
Hi,
I implemented a synonym search by using the chapter 4.6's example from
the Lucene in Action book.
Now I want to extend the example in that way, that synonyms are boosted
less that the original word the user searched for. Is there a way to do
it? If it is, I would like to get any help on how
David,
Lucene is a framework that offers fulltext-indexing and search
capabilities with a very limited support for client/server
communication. The only remote communication mechanism included in
Lucene (I know about - but I'm very confident I did not miss anything
related to that) is the RemoteSea
Dear Simon. Firstly thank you very much for your answer. I've been trying to
debug this problem for a while and I am a bit at a loss.
I am using lucene as search engine as included in a document management system
called KnowledgeTree
(http://wiki.knowledgetree.com/Troubleshooting_the_Document_I
David,
I can not follow you. What kind of Lucene applicaiton are you talking
about. Afaik lucene does not use xmlRPC anywhere and we do not have
any dependency on it (Do I miss something?). There is a RemoteSearcher
/ RemoteSearchable in core (until 2.4.1) and now in contrib/remote
which uses RMI
When running lucene, on a machine with a firewall, I got the following
error message, which I think it must be related to the firewall. In
fact, when I shut down the firewall, the error dissapears. It must be
something relating to the ports I have open. Lucene says it is running
in port 8875. Is th
23 matches
Mail list logo
