Hello,
Is there any class in lucene which will do encoding for term?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-Term-Encoder-tp24228145p24228145.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hi.
I currently have an index which is 16GB per machine (8 machines = 128GB)
(data is stored externally, not in index) and is growing like crazy (we are
indexing blogs which is crazy by nature) and have only allocated 2GB per
machine to the Lucene app since we are running some other stuff there in
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Nigel wrote:
> Currently we're (perhaps naively) doing the equivalent of
> query.weight(searcher).scorer(reader).score(collector). Obviously there's a
> certain amount of unnecessary calculation that results from this if you
> don't care about sorting. Are there
also see,
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_2_0/api/org/apache/lucene/search/BooleanQuery.html#getAllowDocsOutOfOrder()
- Original Message
> From: Nigel
> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2009 4:11:53
> Subject: Optimizing unordered queries
>
> I recently pos
You omitNorms(), did you also omitTf()?
when something like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345 gets
commited, you will have a posibility to see some benefits (e.g. by packing
single postings lists as Filters). The code there optimises exactly that case
as filters contain no Sco
Thanks for your response, i want to explaing more so that you can help me,
the code am writing is as follows
Field termField = new Field("terms",terms, Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.TOKENIZED);
the terms i indexed consists of a concatenated string looks like
"computer,230#pc,333#lucene,201#"
an
The source code is freely available. Take a look at the Similarity
class and where it is used.
Before you do that, though, perhaps there are other ways to achieve
your goals. Feel free to explain what you are trying to do.
-Grant
On Jun 26, 2009, at 5:04 AM, B0DYLANG wrote:
Dears,
i
Currently In DateTime field I am using ConstantScoreRangeQuery to do range
query and doing sorting as String. Even i changed the sort field as Long then
also i don't see much difference in RAM.
When Lucene 2.9 is released? Is there any functionality added for better
sorting?
Regards
Ganesh
--
Isn't it better for you to for a query at search time with query term
boosts? that way you would have a smaller index (Boost info not getting
stored for each doc-field). Also, you would have the flexibility of changing
your boost without having to reindex the entire data.
--
Anshum Gupta
Naukri La
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 21:38 +0200, Nigel wrote:
> It sounds like surely any swapping out of the JVM memory could cause big and
> unpredictable performance drops. As I just mentioned in reply to Uwe, our
> poor performance times don't always directly correlate with index updates,
> but it may be th
Dears,
i want to add some arguments to the lucene formula or override it, is there
a mean of doing so ? thanks for your response.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/customizing-lucene-formula-tp24217132p24217132.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive
dears,
my problem is that i want to apply a wieght for each word i add to the
lucene document, so that when i want to index a sentence like this "Hello
how you doing" i want to add Hello with a boost equals to 0.75 and how with
boost 0.50 and doing with boost 0.3 is there is a mean of doing that
12 matches
Mail list logo
