If u want to reindex already that was indexed then just give create flag
as false
ChadDavis wrote:
>
> In the FAQ's it says that you have to do a manual incremental update:
>
> How do I update a document or a set of documents that are already indexed?
>>
>> There is no direct update proc
Hi Shay,
I think IndexWriter.getReader from LUCENE-1516 in trunk is what
you're talking about? It pools readers internally so there's no
need to call IndexReader.reopen, one simply calls IW.getReader
to get new readers containing recent updates.
-J
BTW I replied to the message on java-u...@lucen
I buy your theory that StandardAnalyzer is breaking up the stream, and that
this might be an indexing issue, rather than a query issue. When I look at
my index in Luke, as far as I can tell the literal (Parenth+eses is stored,
not the broken up tokens. Also, I can't seem to find an Analyzer that
I suspect that what's happening is that StandardAnalyzer is breaking
your stream up on the "odd" characters. All escaping them on the
query does is insure that they're not interpreted by the parser as (in
this case), the beginning of a group and a MUST operator. So, I
claim it correctly feeds (Pare
Say I have a book title, literally:
(Parenth+eses
How would I do a search to find exactly that book title, given the presence
of the ( and + ? QueryParser.escape isn't working.
I would expect to be able to search for (Parenth+eses [exact match] or
(Parenth+e [partial match]
I can use QueryPars
Yep, was a problem with the maven artifact publishing.
Not an actual problem...
jayson.minard wrote:
>
> Does look like the publishing from Solr ANT went to wrong place and wasn't
> being picked up by Maven for the main build.
>
> Confirming but this is most likely a non-issue.
>
> --j
>
>
Does look like the publishing from Solr ANT went to wrong place and wasn't
being picked up by Maven for the main build.
Confirming but this is most likely a non-issue.
--j
jayson.minard wrote:
>
> clearing our maven repo and rebuilding to be sure.
>
>
> Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>>
>> On Thu,
clearing our maven repo and rebuilding to be sure.
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:01 PM, jayson.minard
> wrote:
>>
>> When using the Solr trunk tip, get this error now when reading an index
>> created by Solr with Lucene directly:
>>
>> java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException:
It is the reverse case, created with solr, optimized and then in the
post-optimize listener open snapshot with lucene.
Code used is this:
Directory directory = new FSDirectory(new File(luceneIndexDir), null);
reader = IndexReader.open(directory, true); // open directory read-only
...
reader
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> Hmmm, OK... so you created the index with Lucene and are reading it with Solr.
> What version of Lucene did you use to create?
Oops, vise versa, right?
-Yonik
-
To unsubscr
This is with an optimized index since the code runs just after optimization.
jayson.minard wrote:
>
> When using the Solr trunk tip, get this error now when reading an index
> created by Solr with Lucene directly:
>
> java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 24, Size: 0
> at java.util
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:01 PM, jayson.minard wrote:
>
> When using the Solr trunk tip, get this error now when reading an index
> created by Solr with Lucene directly:
>
> java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 24, Size: 0
> at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
>
When using the Solr trunk tip, get this error now when reading an index
created by Solr with Lucene directly:
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 24, Size: 0
at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
at org
I would say in general, yes.
when i say 'change arabic text', I mean the arabic analyzer will standardize
and stem arabic words. but it won't modify any of your english words.
and no, there is no case in arabic. this is why if you are handling mixed
arabic/english text I recommend creating a cust
Because the exactly same reason, our assumption is that users' profile
information is mixed with only that particular language and English. And
we'll have to use the analyzer for that particular language to do the
indexing and searching. And that's the reason why I asked this analyzer
question. :-)
> Thanks for the quick answer. :-)
>
> So can I say, for ArabicAnalyzer, generally it can tokenize the mixed
> content with Arabic and English? :-)
>
> I am not really familiar with Arabic language. What do you mean for
> "change
> Arabic tokens"? Does Arabic has something like upper/lower case
There are two problems:
a) Currently there is no such analyzer (I have the problem, too, I would
also like to autodetect the language from a text like M$ Word does and
switch the analyzers).
b) If such an autodetect analyzer exists, you will have a problem on the
searching side, because you should
Thanks for the quick answer. :-)
So can I say, for ArabicAnalyzer, generally it can tokenize the mixed
content with Arabic and English? :-)
I am not really familiar with Arabic language. What do you mean for "change
Arabic tokens"? Does Arabic has something like upper/lower case as English
does?
Thanks for the suprising quick response. :-)
What I mean "correctly" here is that the specific analyzer can tokenize a
text mixed with English and that sepcfic langauge, for example, "12345 "
or "Text???" (where '?' is a character of that specific language and
"12345" and "Text" is english
in the case of ArabicAnalyzer it will only change Arabic tokens, and will
leave english words as-is (it will not convert them to lowercase or anything
like that)
so if you want to have good Arabic and English behavior you would want to
create a custom analyzer that looks like Arabic analyzer but a
No. What is "correctly"? Are you stemming? in which case using thesame
analyzer on different languages will not work.
This topic have been discussed on the user list frequently, so if you
searched
that archive (see: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/MailingListArchives)
you'd find a wealth of inf
Hmmm, come to think of it, if you pass the Filter to the search I*think* you
don't get scores for that clause, but you may want to
check it out...
So I think you should think about implementing a HitCollector
and collect only the documents you care about.
This is really very little extra work sin
Hello,
I am a newbie in Lucene world. I might ask some obvious question which
unfortunately I don't know the answer. Please help me 'grow'.
We have a project intend to use Lucene search engine for search some user's
info stored our system. The user info might not be in English even it will
be sto
Yes, I have a pre-defined list of documents that I care about.
Then I can do the search on these, but it will take the statictics of the
whole index, right?
2009/5/14 Erick Erickson
> I don't know if I'm understanding what you want, but if you havea
> pre-defined list of documents, couldn't y
Seid Mohammed:
> I need this exactly solution.
> Can you please tell me how could I DO IT?
> I am badly in nead of it
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Ridzwan Aminuddin
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Is Lucene able to index phrases instead if individual terms? If it is, can
> >> we also
I don't know if I'm understanding what you want, but if you havea
pre-defined list of documents, couldn't you form a Filter? Then
your results would only be the documents you care about.
If this is irrelevant, perhaps you could explain a bit more about
the problem you're trying to solve.
Best
Eri
I need this exactly solution.
Can you please tell me how could I DO IT?
I am badly in nead of it
On 5/14/09, Anshum wrote:
> If I'm interpreting your need correctly, you want to index untokenized
> strings, is it? Even if you aren't looking for untokenized indexing, you
> could always use/design
You can use your Analyzer to get a token stream from any text you give
it, just like Lucene does.
Something like:
String text = "your list of words to analyze and tokenize";
TokenStream ts = YOUR_ANALYZER.tokenStream(null, new
StringReader(text));
Token token = new Token();
while((ts.next(tok
Hi,
I'm rather new to Lucene and could use some help.
My Analyzer uses a set of filters (PorterStemFilter, LowerCaseFilter,
WhitespaceTokenizer). I need to replicate the effect of these filters
outside of the normal Lucene pipeline. Basically I would like to input a
String from one end and get a
Hi,
I have a big index and I want to get for a specific search only the grades
of a list of documents.
Is there a better way to get this score than looping on all the reasults
set?
Thanks,
Liat
Thanks Mike, I will do that
2009/5/13 Michael McCandless
> Unfortunately, no.
>
> If the JRE crashes/exits without IndexWriter.commit (or close) being
> called, then the index will reflect none of the changes during that
> session.
>
> There will be partial files in there (that's why you see so
No, As I wrote above
For finlin, 6621468 * 6, 5265266 * 12 (I use payload for this)
and TTD - 6621468 * 3 (I use payload for this)
I search for 6621468 * 3 and it and finlin gets a higher score
2009/5/13 Grant Ingersoll
>
> On May 13, 2009, at 3:04 AM, liat oren wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot, Grant
32 matches
Mail list logo
