In 2.4, as well as IndexWriter.deleteDocuments(Term) there is also
IndexReader.deleteDocuments(Term).
I understand opening a reader is expensive, so does this means using
IndexWriter.deleteDocuments would be faster from a closed index position?
As the IndexReader instance is newer, it has bet
: You need to write your own sort comparator
: SortField(String field, SortComparatorSource comparator)
A much simpler approach is to index a lowercase version of the field.
since fields used for sorting are typically copies of other existing
fields anyway because they can't be tokenized, ther
Thank you. I've verified the bug is gone!
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:22 AM
> To: undisclosed-recipients
> Subject: [ANN] Luke 0.9.1 - bugfix release
>
> Hi all,
>
> A bugfix release of Luke is now availa
I have some simple indexing benchmarks comparing Lucene 2.3.1 with 2.4:
http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/11/lucene-231-vs-24-benchmarks-using-lusql.html
In the next couple of days I will be running benchmarks comparing
Solr's DataImportHandler/JdbcDataSource indexing performance with
LuSql and wil
Hi csantos,
most possible this is not about lucene:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/AbstractMethodError.html
GermanAnalyser ist not part of normal lucene jar (it is part of
lucene-analyzers).
In application server the position of jar files can be important.
Please try your cod
Hi,
Thanks a lot :)
I will try that.
csantos
- Original Message -
From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: GermanAnalyzer
Hi,
I think your question belongs more onto the Hibernate Search Forum -
http://forum.hibernate
Hi,
I think your question belongs more onto the Hibernate Search Forum -
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewforum.php?f=9.
That said, it looks like a you have a version problem. Hibernate Search
3.0.0 is based on Lucene
Lucene 2.2. I recommend updating Hibernate Search to the latest 3.1.0
rel
Hello,
I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web
Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the
Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser
(for indexing and searching) i get the following error in l
Hello,
I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web
Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the
Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser
(for indexing and searching) i get the following error in localho
Hi,
I've recently published a blog post on extending lucene's scoring with the
org.apache.lucene.search.function package that readers of this list may be
interested in. I'd be really interested to hear what people think of my
aproach and whether there's a better way in the comments.
http://www.ro
Hello,
I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web
Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the
Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser
(for indexing and searching) i get the following error in localhost
11 matches
Mail list logo