Which is faster/better

In 2.4, as well as IndexWriter.deleteDocuments(Term) there is also IndexReader.deleteDocuments(Term). I understand opening a reader is expensive, so does this means using IndexWriter.deleteDocuments would be faster from a closed index position? As the IndexReader instance is newer, it has bet

Re: how to sort the result by ignoring case in lucene

: You need to write your own sort comparator : SortField(String field, SortComparatorSource comparator) A much simpler approach is to index a lowercase version of the field. since fields used for sorting are typically copies of other existing fields anyway because they can't be tokenized, ther

RE: [ANN] Luke 0.9.1 - bugfix release

Thank you. I've verified the bug is gone! > -Original Message- > From: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 10:22 AM > To: undisclosed-recipients > Subject: [ANN] Luke 0.9.1 - bugfix release > > Hi all, > > A bugfix release of Luke is now availa

Lucene 2.3.1 vs 2.4 benchmarks using LuSql

I have some simple indexing benchmarks comparing Lucene 2.3.1 with 2.4: http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/2008/11/lucene-231-vs-24-benchmarks-using-lusql.html In the next couple of days I will be running benchmarks comparing Solr's DataImportHandler/JdbcDataSource indexing performance with LuSql and wil

Re: GermanAnalyzer

Hi csantos, most possible this is not about lucene: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/AbstractMethodError.html GermanAnalyser ist not part of normal lucene jar (it is part of lucene-analyzers). In application server the position of jar files can be important. Please try your cod

Re: GermanAnalyzer

Hi, Thanks a lot :) I will try that. csantos - Original Message - From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 2:42 PM Subject: Re: GermanAnalyzer Hi, I think your question belongs more onto the Hibernate Search Forum - http://forum.hibernate

Re: GermanAnalyzer

Hi, I think your question belongs more onto the Hibernate Search Forum - http://forum.hibernate.org/viewforum.php?f=9. That said, it looks like a you have a version problem. Hibernate Search 3.0.0 is based on Lucene Lucene 2.2. I recommend updating Hibernate Search to the latest 3.1.0 rel

GermanAnalyzer

Hello, I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser (for indexing and searching) i get the following error in l

GermanAnalyzer

Hello, I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser (for indexing and searching) i get the following error in localho

Extending lucene's scoring

Hi, I've recently published a blog post on extending lucene's scoring with the org.apache.lucene.search.function package that readers of this list may be interested in. I'd be really interested to hear what people think of my aproach and whether there's a better way in the comments. http://www.ro

GermanAnalyser

Hello, I'm a newbie with Lucene and I started some testing with a small Web Application with Lucene 2.4.0 and Hibernate Search 3.0.0. The test with the Standard Analyser were successful, but when i try to use the German Analyser (for indexing and searching) i get the following error in localhost