Sure, you can use the same analyzer at query time, or an analyzer
that does what you want. See KeywordAnalyzer for instance
(although that one doesn't lower case, so...). Or just make
your own analyzer, see the Synonym example in Lucene In Action.
Or be really simple, and just (say) lowercase your
Thanks Erick.
I see, the problem is that I use some fields tokenized and other untokenized
but that all the queries are parsed using my analyzer. Is this correct?
I suppose that removing the blanks from learningResourceType before adding
it as an untokenized field helps (provided that I do the s
What *analyzer* are you using for your queries? Have Luke explain
your queries and I suspect you'll see your problem. Which if you're
using StandardAnalyzer is probably that 'case study'
will look like (lrt:case lrt:study). Note that the implied operator is OR
unless
you've changed it. But these ar
Hi all,
Here is a new newbee question.
I'm adding to a lucene index, documents containing a field lrt created as
follows:
doc.add( new Field( "lrt", learningResourceType
.toLowerCase(), Field.Store.NO,
Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED ) ) ;
where possible values for learningResourceType are:
applic
Michael:
Yep, previous implementation have his own buffer to reduce BLOB IO
overriding Input/OutputBufferStream base classes.
Now Input/Output stream classes use BufferStream implementation and
only implement flushInternal and setSize methods among others minimun
changes :)
Best regards, Marc
I'm glad to hear this!
But: what was the root cause of the problems? Why didn't your
previous Input/Output implementations, which worked with Lucene 2.3,
work win 2.4? It's kinda spooky.
Mike
Marcelo Ochoa wrote:
Michael:
I have OJVMDirectory working with 2.4rc2 code base.
I have re
Michael:
I have OJVMDirectory working with 2.4rc2 code base.
I have refactored Output and Input streams classes according to
latest implementation of Buffered base classes and works OK.
All of my tests suites runs OK also the bug in the 11g JITs compiler
is not reproducible.
I'll test this
