Hi Sergey, seems like case 4 and 5 are equivalent,
both meaning case insensitive right. Otherwise please
explain the difference.
If it is required to support both case sensitive
(cases 1,2,3) and case insensitive (case 4/5) then
both forms must be saved in the index - in two separate
fields (as Er
Yeah, you are right. Was looking for a lazy way to avoid writing 5 lines
of code. Hehe.
Thanks,
Darren
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 10:44 -0400, Mark Miller wrote:
> Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I combed through the API and some of the mailing list. I need
> > to get the id of a Document just add
Mark Miller wrote:
Robert Stewart wrote:
Anyone else run on Windows? We have index around 26 GB in size.
Seems file system cache ends up taking up nearly all available RAM
(26 GB out of 32 GB on 64-bit box). Lucene process is around 5 GB,
so very little left over for queries, etc, and box s
Darren Govoni wrote:
Hi,
I combed through the API and some of the mailing list. I need
to get the id of a Document just added. How should this be done?
I'm using Lucene 2.3.2.
thank you,
Darren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
Hi,
I combed through the API and some of the mailing list. I need
to get the id of a Document just added. How should this be done?
I'm using Lucene 2.3.2.
thank you,
Darren
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Robert Stewart wrote:
Anyone else run on Windows? We have index around 26 GB in size. Seems file
system cache ends up taking up nearly all available RAM (26 GB out of 32 GB on
64-bit box). Lucene process is around 5 GB, so very little left over for
queries, etc, and box starts swapping duri
Anyone else run on Windows? We have index around 26 GB in size. Seems file
system cache ends up taking up nearly all available RAM (26 GB out of 32 GB on
64-bit box). Lucene process is around 5 GB, so very little left over for
queries, etc, and box starts swapping during searches. I think ch
It saves you the hassle of closing your IndexWriter, opening an
IndexReader, doing deletes, closing the IndexReader, then opening a
new IndexWriter.
Also, it can be more efficient (depends on your application) since it
may buffer the deletes for longer than you would if you used
IndexReader.
Mike
Hi! I'm using Lucene 2.3.2 to store a relatively-large index of HTML
documents. I'm storing ~150 million documents, taking up 150 GB of space.
I index the HTML text, but I only store primary key information that allows
me to retrieve it later. Thus, my document size is small, but obviously, I
Mike,
what is the difference if I would use IndexWriter?
Michael
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:27, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also, can you do your deletes via IndexWriter (delete by Term) instead of
> opening IndexReader to do the deletes?
>
> Mike
>
> Ian Lea wrote:
>
>> Mic
10 matches
Mail list logo
