Hi there,
for email addresses string such as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]; jack smith"
I might do wild card search like john* or jack* or [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
*wherever.com
for phrase search i can do "jack smith"
for general search i might do "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I tokenized the string and indexed it in
4 jul 2008 kl. 08.30 skrev RanjithStar:
My requirement is to search on SEVEN Fields say F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7
having
F1,F2,F3,F4 on one doc index
and F5,F6,F7 on a different doc index
I need to perform a search with ((F1=9 AND F2=4) AND (F3=keyword OR
F4=keyword)) OR (F5=9 AND F6=4 AND F7=
Please show us a couple of examples from the "various type of search"
you want to be able to handle. The information you supply says nothing
about your use cases.
In what way do you want to use phrase queries on email addresses? Do
you want to tokenize parts of a single email address? Or do
On Freitag, 4. Juli 2008, Gaurav Sharma wrote:
> I am stuck with an exception in lucene (too many clauses).
> When i am using a wild card such as a* i am getting too many clauses
> exception. It saying maximum clause count is set to 1024. Is there any
> way to increase this count.
Please see
http
: How can I trap this situation correctly? I receive user queries like this
: (quotes included):
:
:/from:"fred flintston*"/
:
: Which produces a query string of
:
:/+from:fred body:flintston/ (where /body/ is the default field)
either you've left something out, or some aspect
Yug,
In the root directory of your JBoss install there is a file that lists all
the jar files your version of JBoss is guaranteed to work with
(jar-versions.xml). It looks like the jar you're trying to add has a
dependency on another jar that doesn't have what it's looking for.
Get on the JBoss f
Chris,
Yes, when there are multiple types of queries involved (Term & Wildcard in
this case) that's how I handle it. A disadvantage of this is that the user
input must be somewhat restricted since you need to know what's coming.
An important thing to remember is that Wildcard, Prefix and one othe
Moving to java-user.
Index the field and use the FieldCache.
You don't want to modify core lucene classes for this common use-case.
-Yonik
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, blazingwolf7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to retrieve the contentLength and the URL of each document from
> the
John,
Thanks, I think I'm getting this now So you created your own
BooleanQuery and parsed the string yourself, adding strings as
TermQuerys etc., rather than using a QueryParser ?
Cheers,
- Chris
John Griffin wrote:
Chris,
I've had similar requirements in the past. First strip the
I'm not familiar with JBoss' error output, but, maybe this is telling
you your version of HIbernate is also old (ie depends on Lucene 1.4)?
Mike
yugana wrote:
I see a JAR file at
D:\jboss-portal-2.6.5.GA\server\default\deploy\jboss-portal.sar
\portal-cms.sar\lib
. when I tried to replac
I see a JAR file at
D:\jboss-portal-2.6.5.GA\server\default\deploy\jboss-portal.sar\portal-cms.sar\lib
. when I tried to replace this JAR with the new JAR file, I get the
following errors while restarting the JBoss server.
11:50:10,046 ERROR [URLDeploymentScanner] Incomplete Deployment listing:
On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
If I have a SortField with a type of STRING, is there any way to
sort in a case-insensitive manner?
Couldn't I also use a custom SortComparator?
OK, so I tried that by doing:
SortFi
Are you getting exactly the same error (same source files and exact
same line numbers)? If so, somehow a Lucene 1.4 JAR is still sneaking
in.
Lucene 1.4 won't be able to read an index created by Lucene 2.3.
You'll see exactly that FileNotFoundException because newer versions
of Lucene
13 matches
Mail list logo
