Hi,
BoostingQuery is designed to demote the scores of documents when they match
the undesired
query by the boosting/demoting the final score. The problem I see is this
demoting factor is static/universal in the sense that it does not depend on
how much the docs match the negative query terms. Ideal
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:08:29 Aditi Goyal wrote:
> Oh. For one moment I was elated to hear the news. :(
> Is there any way out?
*:* -"jakarta apache"
Or subclass QueryParser and override the getBooleanQuery() method to do this
behind the scenes using MatchAllDocsQuery.
Daniel
---
Hi,
I am using Lucene to index text based files :
File file = new File("C:/index");
if(file.exists() == false{
IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(file,new
StandardAnalyzer(),true);
}
Can you describe how you are using Lucene, and provide a full traceback?
Mike
Sebastin wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing this error while doing Indexing text files.can anyone
guide me
how to resolve this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/java.io.Ioexception-cannot-o
On Jun 21, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Karl Wettin wrote:
How do you handle token payload that represent multiple values? I
simply don't do it even though there are cases where I would like to
see it. I also find that my token filters that update payload feels
sort of quick and dirty, that it use a
Hi All,
I am facing this error while doing Indexing text files.can anyone guide me
how to resolve this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/java.io.Ioexception-cannot-overwrite-fdt-tp18079321p18079321.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble
Hello,
I need to be able to select a random word out of all the words in my index.
how can I do this tru termDocs() ?
Also, I need to get a list of unique words as well. Is there a way to ask
this to lucene?
Best Regards,
-C.B.
On Montag, 23. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
> According to the current Lucene documentation at
> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_3_2/api/index.html it seems to me that
> the Query class doesn't have any explain() methods.
It's in the IndexSearcher and it takes a query and a document number as i
Hello,
Basically I think you need to use NGramFilter, this will be alot faster
than the searches you list, but will make your index much larger too.
In Solr this can be achieved with something like:
Hello.
I am trying to implement a search based on a search text in an index that
contains Track Title, Album Name or Artist Name information that delivers a
list or results that are suited for "auto completion" to make searching
easier for the user. This search is very performance critical. The r
I'm sorry, the problem was with the way the id was being indexed. It was
marked as tokenized, so I when searched for it's untokenized form I was not
getting the doc, now everything works fine :)
Regards
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 20 jun 2008 kl. 1
Thanks! Lucene in Action is very helpful.
-James
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Indexing-and-searching-txt-files-tp18031330p18067808.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
>>Could you tell me what's wrong here, please?
There are potentially a number of factors at play here.
Your use of FuzzyLikeThis is fine - just tried the code on my single-term
"Paul" query and as I outlined before it is doing a much better job of matching
(Paul~= results Paul,Paul,PaulPhul
Hi,
I have around 10 different indexfiles to request. Is it better to do
this via one request to one MultiReader or is better to request the 10
indeces one after another?
Especially for doing some filtering on the result with a HitCollector
it might by easier to use the multi request approch
Thanks for your reply, Mark.
This was my original code for constructing my query using FuzzyQuery:
BooleanQuery query = new BooleanQuery();
if (artist.length() > 0) {
FuzzyQuery artist_query = new FuzzyQuery(new Term("artist",
artist));
query.add(artist_query, BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
I've tried everything I can think of and I still can't unsubscribe
from java-user@lucene.apache.org . None of my unsubscribe or emails to
java-user-unsubscribe or java-user-help seem to do anything.
Any help would be appreciated.
thanks -- Will
--
>>I do have serious problems with the relevance of the results with fuzzy
>>queries.
Please take the time to read my response here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/62050#62050
I had a work colleague come up with exactly the same problem this week and the
solution is
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 20:37 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
>
> > Since fuzzy searching is based on the Levenshtein distance, the distance
> > between "coldplay" and "coldplay" is 0 and the distance between
> > "coldplay" and "downplay" is 3
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:09 +0100, markharw00d wrote:
> This looks like it is related to an issue I first raised here:
> http://markmail.org/message/37ywsemfudpos6uh
>
> At the time I identified 2 issues with FuzzyQuery - that the usual
> "coord" and "idf" scoring factors shouldn't
Hi Sebastin ,
Why dont you index all data into single or some fixed number of indexes and
search over them. You can always restrict your search using the range query
based on user given inputs.
--Sai Krishna.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 21:10 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 18. Juni 2008, László Monda wrote:
>
> > Additional info: Lucene seems to do the right thing when only few
> > documents are present, but goes crazy when there is about 1.5 million
> > documents in the index.
>
> Lucene works w
Hi Aditi,
As Rohit said, the best way to solve this problem is to have two fields for
indexing an email-id, one for the username and another for domain name.
Having two fields and using a Boolean Query with MUST condition should solve
your problem. You can also perform restricted search with the
Hi aditi,
U can have a field corresponding to this domainIt will solve ur
problem..
bye
Rohit
Impetus technologies- noida
mob. 09910220475
On 6/23/08, Aditi Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Lucene for creating indexes. There is one field as "email" which
> st
I am using MultiFieldQueryParser. Can I use setAllowLeadingWildCard with
MultiFieldQueryParser?I am doing the following:
parser = lucene.MultiFieldQueryParser(fields, analyzer )
parser.setAllowLeadingWildcard(True)
query = parser.parse(command)
And I am getting
Oh. For one moment I was elated to hear the news. :(
Is there any way out?
Thanks,
Aditi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Aditi,
> Sorry for typo. You cannot edit it alone.
> Warm Regards,
> Allahbaksh
>
> Allahbaksh Mohammedali A
Hi Aditi,
Sorry for typo. You cannot edit it alone.
Warm Regards,
Allahbaksh
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah,
Software Engineering & Technology Labs,
Infosys Technolgies Limited, Electronics City,
Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 100, India.
*Board: +91-80-28520261 | Extn: 53915 | Direct: 41173915.
Fax:
Yes Aditi You can use it alone.
Warm regards,
Allahbaksh
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah,
Software Engineering & Technology Labs,
Infosys Technolgies Limited, Electronics City,
Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 100, India.
*Board: +91-80-28520261 | Extn: 53915 | Direct: 41173915.
Fax: +91-80-28520362 | M
Thank you Allahbaksh for taking so much pains. The link says it cannot be
used alone.
Note: The NOT operator cannot be used with just one term. For example, the
following search will return no results:
NOT "jakarta apache"
Thanks,
Aditi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Allahbaksh Mohammedali As
Hi Aditi,
You can search using NOT operator. You can go through below link for Query
details http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html
Warm Regards,
Allahbaksh
Allahbaksh Mohammedali Asadullah,
Software Engineering & Technology Labs,
Infosys Technolgies Limited, Electronics City,
29 matches
Mail list logo
