Re: Seeking suggestion on results re-ranking methodology

There might be something here: http://wunderwood.org/most_casual_observer/2007/04/progressive_reranking.html Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Sengly Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Friday, Ju

Re: Match "best one" from list

: BESTOF( "apple"^10, "orange"^9, "pear"^8, "peach"^8, "grapes"^2 ) : : So ideally in this field we want to find "apple", but would accept one of : the other pre-defined alternatives as a match. If the document field : contains apples it scores higher than if it only contains oranges, but a : d

RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

TO : Glen Newton Thank you very much! I am so glad to learn it. > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:51:51 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > java-user@lucene.apache.org> Subject: Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with > 1,2,4,8 readers> > Lutan,> > Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next >

Re: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

Lutan, Yes, no problem. I am away at a conference next week but plan to release the code the following week. Is this OK for you? thanks, Glen 2008/6/13 lutan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study. > I have try to using java.util.concu

Re: [BEGINNER]Query on index with number

Thank you for your valuable help, now i can solve the problem. Much respect to the team and various helpers :) Robbie Ian Lea wrote: > > Try StandardAnalyzer rather than SimpleAnalyzer. See the javadocs for > these classes and the tokenizers they use for explanations. > > SimpleAnalyzer use

Seeking suggestion on results re-ranking methodology

Dear all, I would like to seek your suggestion on re-ranking methodology. My problem is that I have a set of resulting documents to a query and each one of them with a matching score and also a list of relatedness score between each two of them. I would like to re-rank my resulting documents by do

Re: [BEGINNER]Query on index with number

Try StandardAnalyzer rather than SimpleAnalyzer. See the javadocs for these classes and the tokenizers they use for explanations. SimpleAnalyzer uses LetterTokenizer which divides text at non-letters. -- Ian. On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:00 PM, MaxiRobbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, >

[BEGINNER]Query on index with number

Hi all, I've worked just a little with Lucene and now i need some stuffs to be done but i can't find responses in faq or how-to. My index contains products title like Nikon d300, nikon d200, nikon d3 i'm using SimpleAnalyzer and when i query for title:d300, it's transformed in title:d and the

Re: Multi keyword match

Have you looked at: http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/queryparsersyntax.html ?? Best Erick On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:01 AM, sandyg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi guys , > I need ur help. > I am working with lucene engine its very good. > but I had some problem. > like my document contain

AW: retrieve all docs efficiently - just one field

There might be quite a lot of users in different groups, but more important the user access rights might change and keeping them up to date in the index would be a real challenge. But thanks for the LUCENE-879 tip. I will look into that next week. Jo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht

Multi keyword match

Hi guys , I need ur help. I am working with lucene engine its very good. but I had some problem. like my document contains feilds like id , name , desg i need to search " id=1 and name=sandy and desg = manager " where i need documents which satisfies three conditions please help me if you h

Re: Giving Boost to a certain category of pages

You missed the point. They have different intents, so speed is irrelevant. >From your original post: <<>> In which case you want to do index-time boosting. So don't do anything until you understand the difference ... Best Erick On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, sumittyagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

RE: Concurrent query benchmarks, with 1,2,4,8 readers

TO: Glen Newton Could I get your test code or code architecture for study. I have try to using java.util.concurrent package( like ArrayBlockingQueue ThreadPoolExecutor;) with lucene,but it is no successful.I don't know how to design. Thanks ! my emial: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

Very grateful for Toke Eskildsen of attention my questions. > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:59:27 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: > The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test> To: > java-user@lucene.apache.org> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:56 +0800, lutan > wrote:> > Yes ,

RE: The performance of lucene searching(web entironment) test

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:56 +0800, lutan wrote: > Yes ,I have test again with same entironment but to use singleton > IndexSearcher.the performance has increased. there 100 concurrent > user request use different keyword ,and get 60 TPS(2 TPS before). > and now the bottleneck seem to be CPU,and