On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:42 -0300, Leandro wrote:
> machine1: Windows XP SP2, Celerom 2.66GHz e 256MB
If that is a physical machine (as opposed to virtual), then the amount
of RAM if not at all well balanced against the processor speed.
> [...] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
How muc
Hi Prashant,
It would help to take a look at DataImportHandler (in development) in Solr.
Solr is built to be used in a web applications and DataImportHandler is
built to be used to import data from databases.
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
On Thu, Ap
i got a problem yesterday,
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter$ThreadState.init(DocumentsWriter.java:751)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.getThreadState(DocumentsWriter.java:2391)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(Documen
Prashant,
In addition to the other suggestions, take a look at Hibernate Search at
http://www.hibernate.org/410.html.
It is specifically designed for full text search in DBs.
John G
_
From: Prashant Saraf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:57 AM
To: j
Hi,
We are using Lucene 2.0 to index data stored inside
relational database. Like any relational database, our
database has quite a few one-to-one and one-to-many
relationships. For example, lets say an Object A has
one-to-many relationship with Object X and Object Y.
As we need to de-normalize r
Chris McGee wrote:
These tips have significantly improved the time to build the directory and
search it. However, I have noticed that when I perform term queries using
a searcher many times in rapid succession and iterate over all of the hits
it can take a significant time. To perform 1000 te
>
> If tye 16M means you're only giving the process that much memory, it
> surprises
> me that it runs at all. Especially since you're putting it all in a
> RAMdir.
>
Sorry that 16M is dictonarySizeInBytes() I would imagine that it is the same
size of index...
Well when I start to use a Dictonary
If tye 16M means you're only giving the process that much memory, it
surprises
me that it runs at all. Especially since you're putting it all in a RAMdir.
Or is that 16M referring to something else?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Leandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> *Sam
>From this <<< iterate over all of the hits>>> I infer that you're
using a Hits object. This is a no-no when getting more than 100
or so objects. In a nutshell, the query gets re-executed every 100
fetches. So your 2,000 hits are executing the query 20 times.
The Hits object is optimized for retur
Hello,
*Sample code:*
SpellChecker spell;
RAMDirectory dram = new RAMDirectory();
Dicionario dic = new Dicionario(); //one implementation of spell.Dictionary
spell= new SpellChecker(dram);
spell.indexDictionary(dic); //indexing...
*Then I got the:*
machine1: Windows XP SP2, Celerom 2.66GHz e 256M
Hello,
I am building fairly large directories (200-500 MB of disk space) using
lucene-java. Sometimes it can take upwards of 10-15 mins to create the
documents and write them to disk using my current configuration. I have
upgraded to the latest 2.3.1 version and followed many of the
recommenda
: term from the query, this part of Lucene should be smarter to know how to
: handle wildcards or even regex, so if "foo*" is received from the query, it
: will start with retieving the TermInfo for just "foo", and then will
: continue and add up more and more TermInfo structure to its cache (or
:
Donna,
so this doesn't work because search calls internaly MultiTermQuery.rewrite
which causes TooManyClauses exception anyway even if the maxnumhits
is set to 200 !!
So I am lost again...
Chose
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Donna L Gresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't the following d
Without changing your existing code, you can use DBSight free version
to create a Lucene index on your database data, and provide search on
it.
It'll take you less time to get it going than reading all the manual
or marketing materials.
--
Chris Lu
-
Instant Scalable Full
Thanks I will check this out
Thanks and Regards
प्रशांत सराफ
(Prashant Saraf)
SE-II
Cross Country Infotech
Ext : 72543
www.crosscountry.in
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 7:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subje
> Hi,
>
> We are planning to provide search functionality in the a web
> base application. Can we use Lucene for it to search data from database like
> oracle and MS-Sql?
>
Yes, you can.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards
>प्रशांत सराफ
> (Prashant Saraf)
> SE-II
> Cross Country Inf
As always, "It depends". What is it you really want to do? Lucene excels at
searching text, NOT at doing RDBM sorts of operations. So if you have large
amounts of text in columns in your DB, you can certainly put them in a
Lucene index and search. But as soon as you find yourself trying to make
Luc
have a look at Compass.
M.
Prashant Saraf a écrit :
Hi,
We are planning to provide search functionality in the a
web base application. Can we use Lucene for it to search data from
database like oracle and MS-Sql?
Thanks and Regards
प्रशांत सराफ
(Prashant Saraf)
S
Hi,
We are planning to provide search functionality in the a web base
application. Can we use Lucene for it to search data from database like oracle
and MS-Sql?
Thanks and Regards
प्रशांत सराफ
(Prashant Saraf)
SE-II
Cross Country Infotech
Ext : 72543
www.crosscountry.i
Hi Donna,
thanks for the reply!
I didn't try yet, but you are probably right that this should work for me.
The filter parameter and the fact that TopDocs doesn't have the
getter to the scoreDocs were confusing to me.
Thanks a lot,
Chose
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Donna L Gresh <[EMAIL PRO
Doesn't the following do what you want with maxnumhits =200?
TopDocs td;
td = indexSearcher.search(query, filter, maxnumhits);
where filter can be null
Donna L. Gresh
Services Research, Mathematical Sciences Department
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
(914) 945-247
Hello everybody,
I know there was written a tons of words about this issue, but I'm just not
clear enough about it.
I have these facts:
1. my query is always 1 letter and *, eg. M*
2. i always want to get max 200 results, no more!
3. i don't want to fix this issue by setting maxClauseCount
I jus
22 matches
Mail list logo
